Educating Children to Avodas Hashem In Eretz Yisrael – Avraham Shusteris

The American Yeshiva Day School fraud

The problem in our yeshiva day schools is that the real priority is to produce students who will succeed in the secular world. Opinion.

Avraham Shusteris, Dec 20, 2020 11:18 PM
Arutz Sheva

In Soviet Russia, where my parents are from, there was a famous saying amongst the working class: “We pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us”.

Somehow the employer and employee each thought they had the upper hand by cheating the other and this allowed for the system to continue. As a result, nothing ever got done. It was a lie, but a lie that everyone was comfortable with, so it continued on until the country imploded.

Today, the Yeshiva day school system is continuing a similarly comfortable and convenient pretense. The parent body and school system pretend to provide their utmost in giving their children the best Jewish and secular education possible, while the children go along with the system, playing the role that the day school system expects of them.

Once it’s time for college, the pretense is exposed. Looking back at my high school class 17 years after graduation, most of my peers are no longer shomer shabbat, and of the minority that stayed Sabbath observant most have become Open Orthodox – basically neo-Conservative, even if they now call themselves Modern Orthodox. Very few of my high school peers maintained the true Modern Orthodox lifestyle, where scrupulous adherence to Torah comes before Derech Eretz (taking an active part in the professional, scientifc and academic world) of their parents as personified by Rabbi J.B. Soloveitchik’s students. A small sprinkle “frummed out” and became hareidi.

I don’t have an axe to grind with the American Yeshiva Day School System. In fact, I am grateful that they agreed to take in a young Russian boy like myself from a non observant family, something that would probably never happen in a more yeshivish school. Also, the rigorous study discipline that I experienced in my yeshiva day school made my college workload feel like a walk in the park. Nevertheless, there is a major problem that exists in this system with tragic consequences and it needs to be brought out in the open.

The main crux of the problem in yeshiva day schools is that it is abundantly clear to everyone, although never outwardly expressed, that the real priorities of the system are intended to produce students that will one day achieve success in the secular world. This means getting into great colleges and eventually getting great jobs. The system is extraordinarily successful in this regard.

That being said, all parties in this system, including the parents, the schools and the students all know that this is and was the real priority – and it isn’t spiritual growth. Although publicly the schools preached an uncompromising dual commitment to Yiddishkeit and academic excellence, no one was under the illusion that these two priorities were somehow equal. No state of the art beis medrash (study hall), inspirational lecture series or 10 day trip to Poland or even Israel could change that simple reality. Material success is what truly mattered when I was a student in yeshiva day school, and I suspect not much has changed in 17 years.

Our school preached love for Israel and commitment for Israel. We waved our flags and we marched in the parades. However, when it came to practically making Aliyah, there were few takers.

Children smell hypocrisy from a mile away…

And there is another example regarding which our education failed. Our school preached love for Israel and commitment for Israel. We waved our flags and we marched in the parades. However, when it came to practically making Aliyah, there were few takers.

The issue is not one that is unique to the Modern Orthodox community.

Gone are the days of real ideological disputes between misnagdim and hasidim, Modern Orthodox and yeshivish. Those were for the simpler times, when Jews were still poor and sidelined members of society. Today, when we have reached the pinnacles of success in the secular world, the hashkafic distinctions that once defined us are no longer real.

Today there are two types of people. There are people who are primarily focused on the material, and others who are primarily focused on the spiritual. There can only be one true priority. This dilemma of spiritual vs material priorities holds true for not only the Modern Orthodox, but for the hareidi world as well. What separates the hareidi wall street daf yomi lawyer working 70 hours a week from the Modern Orthodox one? The color and fabric of his kippah?

There are hareidi materialists and Modern Orthodox ones. There are also poor materialists and wealthy spiritualists and visa versa. What distinguishes us is not our type of kippah or the size of our bank account, but where our priorities lie.

If we want our primary focus and our children’s primary focus to be spiritual, ruchniyus, we need to take action to make it so. There is no greater practical expression of Emunah and yearning to come close to Hashem than foregoing all of the comforts and conveniences of life in America and coming to live in Eretz Yisrael. What other mitzvah proves where your true priorities lie? You can be a Jewish materialist and send your son to Brisk and visit Israel three times a year for Yom tov. It’s harder to be a materialist and actually live in Eretz Yisrael.

Schools and Jewish educational organizations recognize that the Israel experience is the most successful educational experience that can inspire, uplift, and re energize our children and rededicate them to their Judaism. The yeshivish send their kids to Eretz Yisrael to learn before and after marriage, the Modern Orthodox send their kids to study for a year or two after high school, while the non affiliated send their children on birthright to hopefully inspire them to marry Jewish.

Eretz Yisrael has the effect of connecting the Jew to his roots across all religious spectrums. Educators try to bring the Israel experience to America in any way that they can to try to rekindle the spark of our Jewish youth’s souls.

The Israeli Religious Zionist school system has much the same problems, with similar dialectics between religious and secular studies and a too high rate of non-observant graduates (known in Israel as datlashim – formerly religious). However, there is a very large selection of Yeshiva high schools, among which there are a good number where it is clear to the students that Yiddishkeit and spirituality come first even when secular subjects are on a high level. In addition, these Yeshiva high schools work hard to have students go into a higher Torah learning program such as hesder before army service, so as to create a post high school spiritual atmosphere with no other distractions. Yeshiva high schools measure their success by how many students chose that extra period of Torah learning before the army, and in the case of hesder, students also return for another year of Torah after their army service.

Maybe it’s time to reconsider our logic in America. Instead of bringing the Israel experience to America, why not do something simpler. Let’s give our children more of an Israel experience in Israel, by bringing them there – with us – and making our homes here.

The longer we wait the more difficult it will become.

Avraham Shusteris is an accountant in Ramat Beit Shemesh. He made aliyah from Monsey with his family in 2018.

חיסון הקורונה: עצומה לעצירת הסנקציות והכפייה!

אני דורש/ת שהממשלה תמנע כל הגבלה על אלו שאינם מעוניינים לקבל חיסון פוטנציאלי לקורונה COVID-19ׂ. הגבלות על נסיעות, טיסות, נופש, אירועים חברתיים, אירועי תרבות או ספורט. ללא הגבלות כלשהן.
אינכם יכולים לכפות על מישהו לעשות חיסון, ולא צריכים להיות מסוגלים לכפות על אדם את החיסון באמצעות הגבלות.
יש לנו הזכות להעריך את הסיכון בעצמנו כפי שעשינו בעבר.
* במקביל לעצומה זו, התפרסמה הערב (19.12.20) קריאה באותו העניין של מעל 100 ממיטב הרופאים בארץ.
בנוסף, אתמול (29.12.20) התפרסמה קריאה של 78 ממיטב עורכי הדין בארץ (נכון לעכשיו) הקוראים לעצירת הסנקציות והכפייה!

‘In Those Days There Was No King in Israel’ – Rabbi Avi Grossman Explains

More On Returning Our Judges

A colleague claimed that the ideal Jewish government was that of the time of the Judges; I agree with that view.

The Maimonidean viewpoint: although the Talmud says that Israel was commanded to both appoint a king and build the Temple, Maimonides’s formulations of these halachoth show that the kingdom does not have to be led by a hereditary king, but rather that the role of the king can also be filled by a prophet or judge, and thus we have Talmudic statements that Moses, Joshua, Gideon, Jephtah, and Samuel all counted as kings, and explains why Samuel himself felt that the arrangement that had existed until then should remain. Further, the Tabernacle at Shilo was considered a Temple for all intents and purposes, even if it was eventually relocated. Thus, the situation as described at the end of the Book of Joshua was an ideal and optimistic situation. The nation had a king and a Temple, and they had a golden opportunity to complete the conquest of the land.

As for the book of Judges and how it describes periods of backsliding into paganism, the book also makes clear that is was the judges themselves who brought about the return to proper worship, and the backsliding only happened once a judge was dead. If anything, the prophetic voice might be implicitly criticizing the leaders for not ensuring that they would be succeeded by other suitable leaders. Moses himself made sure he would be succeeded, but we do not find that Joshua or any others sought to do likewise. Samuel himself was the first to set the stage for his own succession, but it was his unpopular choices that partially led the people to request the appointment of an established hereditary monarch. The last chapters of Judges, which describe two catastrophies shortly after Joshua’s death, also have a refrain, almost like a chorus, that “in those days, there was no king in israel.” One could be excused if he were to understand this to mean that the people had an established idolatrous shrine and a disastrous civil war because they had no hereditary king to enforce Torah law. However, a closer look at the text indicates as the Redak and the other mideival commentators understood it: these tragedies happened because there was no “king” then. I.e., Joshua had died, and no judge had yet arisen, but had Joshua or one of the judges been around, it would not and could not have happened.

As we prepare for yet more elections here in Israel, and as we see America reeling in the midst of a sweeping regime change, I wonder what people honestly expect from government. Too many people I know voted against Trump because they blamed him for Covid and all of its repercussions, that he should have done something, but they have yet to consider that had he done any of those somethings that they suggest, they would have hated him even more for restricting their freedoms. Trump is and was far from perfect, but at least he realized that certain things can and should not be in the hands of government, because not only can it not succeed, it will cause even more harm. Here is Israel, we should be held to a higher standard, and we will only have a proper government when, as a people we realize what government’s role should be: absolutely nothing except national security and the enforcement of the rule of law.

From Rabbi Avi Grossman, here.

נגרשתי מנגד עיניך אך אוסיף להביט אל היכל קדשך

שימו לב! בעקבות הסגר הכניסה לשכנים בלבד

הוֹצִיאָה מִמַּסְגֵּר נַפְשִׁי לְהוֹדוֹת אֶת שְׁמֶךָ • הכניסה להר הבית תותר רק למתגוררים עד ק”מ מההר • 112 יהודים עלו היום לפני הסגר • תרעומת על סגירת ההר לתפילה דווקא בימי המגפה • רבים מהגרים בסמוך להר הבית הודיעו שיעלו בתכיפות, כדי לשמש כשליחי ציבור

בן למואל יום ראשון, י”ב טבת ה’תשפ”א

בעקבות הגבלת המרחק שהוטלה כחלק מהסגר, תותר הכניסה להר הבית למתגוררים במרחק של עד 1000 מטר מהכניסה להר הבית.

יהודים שמתגוררים במרחק רב יותר מההר לא יורשו להכנס להר הבית.

היום עלו 112 יהודים להר הבית, כדי לנצל את היום האחרון לפני הסגר.

בין העולים היום בלט חבר הכנסת החדש ניסים ואטורי, אשר כתב פוסט נרגש לאחר עלייתו.

היום התקיימו שלושה מנייני מנחה אל מול שער המזרח.

עולי הר הבית הביעו תרעומת רבה על כך שדווקא בעת המגפה נסגר הר הבית לתפילה של רוב עם ישראל.

יהודים רבים שמתגוררים סמוך להר הבית הודיעו שיקפידו לעלות בתדירות גבוה בעת הסגר ולשמש כשליחי ציבור נאמנים.

מאתר חדשות הר הבית, כאן.

The Murderers In White Coats and HXC

AMA Lied – How Many Died?

The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

The AMA is synonymous with organized medicine, despite myriad specialty societies that may better represent the needs of its member physicians. In fact, only 12 percent of practicing physicians belong to the AMA due to concerns that the AMA is more interested in its own finances and politics than the concerns of doctors.

When the AMA talks, media and the public listen, due to their perceived clout. Last spring, the AMA issued a statement critical of hydroxychloroquine as it was being used off-label in the treatment of COVID, not FDA-approved for this purpose with supposed “dangerous side effects.”

Quietly at the end of October, the AMA issued a new statement, conveniently overlooked by the media, giving the green light to doctors prescribing HCQ to their COVID patients.

RESOLVED, that our American Medical Association rescind its statement calling for physicians to stop prescribing hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine until sufficient evidence becomes available to conclusively illustrate that the harm associated with use outweighs benefit early in the disease course.

An updated statement clarifying our support for a physician’s ability to prescribe an FDA-approved medication for off label use, if it is in her/his best clinical judgement, with specific reference to the use of hydroxychloroquine and combination therapies for the treatment of the earliest stage of COVID-19.

What changed since last spring? How many COVID deaths could have been prevented if doctors, using their professional and clinical judgement, could have prescribed HCQ without fear of ostracization or loss of their jobs?

HCQ has been around since the 1950s, approved as a malarial preventative and for treatment of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. It is relatively safe, except for the one in a thousand with a rare cardiac arrhythmia, easily identified by a pretreatment EKG. In many African countries, HCQ is available without a prescription for malaria prevention.

The problem arose when President Trump touted HCQ as a “potential therapeutic,” based on early reports of doctors prescribing it with good results. He did not tell anyone to take it but held it out as hope to a country suffering under a pandemic with lockdowns, quarantines, hospitalizations, and deaths.

Trump also took HCQ himself, prescribed by the White House medical team. If Trump claimed drinking water was healthy, the media and medical establishment would have denounced it, citing cases of people dying from drinking too much water.

A perfect example was Fox News crank Neil Cavuto screaming how hydroxy “will kill you.” This was based on a flawed VA study finding no benefit for HCQ in a severely ill cohort of patients, and a higher death rate among those receiving HCQ. This was a retrospective study which did not address the possibility that HCQ was given to sicker patients, who were more likely to die anyway.

Prestigious medical journals, Lancet and New England Journal, retracted published studies raising alarms about HCQ due to bogus study data. It seemed there was a jihad against HCQ from the medical establishment, supported by the media, simply because the Orange Man suggested it.

Was the concern solely over off-label use of drugs? In my world, Avastin has been successfully used off-label for 15 years for the treatment of macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, despite FDA approval only for cancer and a black box warning about gastrointestinal perforation, wound healing, and hemorrhage.

In relative terms, HCQ is a far safer drug compared to Avastin. Ketamine is another old drug similar to HCQ, FDA-approved in 1970 as a general anesthetic. Yet it is increasingly being used off-label to treat severe depression, anxiety, and PTSD. As a general anesthetic, it certainly can kill you if used improperly, but used under the considered judgment of a physician, it can literally save lives. Neil Cavuto hasn’t yet offered his expert medical opinion on ketamine.

There have been 187 hydroxy studies, 122 of which were peer-reviewed. 100 percent of these studies reported positive effects for early treatment of COVID, meaning, for those not yet in the hospital, and certainly not on a ventilator. These studies were performed and reported this year, while the AMA stayed mum, standing by their admonition against HCQ, until their “oh by the way” report at the end of October.

The AMA’s about-face is curious in terms of timing. They could have tempered their initial remarks last summer, when the “America’s Frontline Doctors” group was promoting HCQ, azithromycin, and zinc as an effective early treatment for COVID. All three components of their cocktail were off label. In fact, at the time there was no approved therapeutic for COVID and many people could have been treated earlier, potentially keeping them out of the hospital or worse.

Perfect is the enemy of good. Prospective randomized clinical trials would have been great, but they take time. Why not let physicians use their “best clinical judgment” as the recent AMA statement recommends?

Instead, the AMA waited until Oct. 30 to announce a more reasoned position, not coincidently just a few days before the presidential election. Democrats and the media blamed Trump for every COVID illness and death, accusing Trump of “misleading” on HCQ, as a prominent campaign issue.

Continue reading…

From American Thinker, here.