‘Hatzibbur Hacharedi’ Party: Brazen Moral Degenerates — A Dossier
- Moti Leitner
- N. Yaffe
- Moti Rubinstein
- Rabbi Yehoshua Pfeffer
- Rabbi Dovid Leibel
Lies, whopping lies, treachery, and so on are what qualify someone to be a politician. Yes “charedi”, not really charedi; snore. Let’s talk about kedushas habris instead. Why should anyone listen to shameless degenerates?!
These are not individuals but public figures in a suprapolitical “Movement” for social change, still alive and kicking today. Quoting: “אנחנו אירוע אידאולוגי, אנחנו לא אירוע של ג’ובים. הבשורה הזו חייבת להישמע במרחב”. The head of the party declared they will return to politics.
No. 5 on the list, Moti Rubinstein, was the publisher of indecent pictures of women (source: see this exposé). He only left Hamakom later, May 2025.
Chairman of the party’s rabbinic council, Rabbi Yehoshua Pfeffer, knowingly marketed and contributed to Rubinstein’s aforementioned publication containing indecent pictures (source: same link again, including a record of my own correspondence with him).
Rabbi of Moti Rubinstein and of Asher Fredi, the party’s No. 2, and a meaningful figure supporting the party in general (as they noted truthfully in their elections newspaper), Rabbi Dovid Leibel, was informed about the spreading of indecent images, admitted the severity of the charges, and then refused to stop it. Indeed, he lends his name and rabbinic authority to the project (source: same link as above, including a record of our correspondence).
All three are מחטיא את הרבים.
No. 1 on the party list, Moti Leitner looks at loose women publicizing themselves wearing bathing suits and indeed sustains them by being a public, online “follower” (a number that they can track) on social media (source: Dolev Davidovich, minutes 7:08-8:33). Leitner was asked by Davidovich to explain, and his brazen responses make it far worse.
No. 3 on the list, N. Yaffe went to Harvard and Princeton to learn advanced “psychology” with goyim. Case closed. Why add anything?
But to illustrate, Yaffe casually used vulgar profanity in a public interview, while laughing (not even as a swear word), the sort that even some non-Jews shy away from (source: the first sentence of the eighth paragraph here). Nor can she claim ignorance of the word’s meaning, considering her advanced academic credentials and the fact that she watches goyish movies (hmm, does she need Netflix to access “12 Angry Men”?).
Quoting Yaffe:
“יש מקומות שבלי הפרדה, נשים או גברים לא ילכו לאקדמיה. זו הדרך היחידה, במיוחד עבור חלק מהצעירים. אבל יש מקצועות מסוימים שבהם צריך להתעקש על לימודי המשך מעורבים, כמו פסיכולוגיה. זה חייב להיות ענייני ורגיש, לא שרירותי. החיים מורכבים, המציאות מורכבת וגם המענה צריך להיות מורכב. עשיתי במשפחה פרופגנדה רצינית ללימודים, אח שלי למד מחשבים לתואר ראשון ועכשיו הוא עובד במשרת סטודנט באינטל. הוא לא היה הולך ללימודים מעורבים. אולי עוד כמה שנים זה ישתנה, אבל הצעדים הראשונים צריכים להיות חכמים”.
(Of course, I didn’t look into everyone in their party.)
Last time we contacted “Hatzibbur Hacharedi” (about the self-endorsement scandal) there was no response; let’s see if anything changes this time around.
Note:
God forbid, I am not suggesting other Jewish politicians are any different. Think: the Gedolim’s mouthpiece and confidant, adulterer C. Walder, Y. Litzman, strong defender of Leifer, a convicted child rapist, or Meir Porush, active defender of infamous rapist and womanizer, E. Berland. More such news about their circles would not shock me.
לא מביע עמדה, רק מעתיק ובוחר מה להעתיק
הרב גדליהו אקסלרוד, גילוי דעת חריף נגד מפלגות שיתמכו בממשלה עם המפלגות הערביות:
![]()
