תיקוני עירובין גליון 344#

גליון שאלות הלכתיות המתחדשות מידי שבוע בבדיקת העירובים השכונתיים

השבוע בגליון: הרב ביקש תיקון קטן והתברר שהתיקון גדול / הסבר מהו ראש הלבשה עם שני סוגים / נסיון להקמת עירוב במזרח ירושלים, ויש עמוד תאורה שמתרחב וכשר אבל עומד על קובית בטון / האם מועיל לעשות מדרגה לפני העמוד / עירוב חצרות בין השוכנים באוהלים בעיר חברון / האם אוהל מחייב עירוב בפת / הנחת העירוב באהל / העברת חפצים בין שתי ישיבות מעל הגדר / האם ישיבה קטנה שאוכלים בה רק סעודה שלישית נחשבת בית ומחייבת עירוב.

הודאה לה’ על הנס שאירע לנו השבוע, שרכב העירוב התחיל לבעור בתוך שטח קוצים, וניצלנו, וגם הרכב ניצל וחולץ, וכבר המשיך בעשיית מצוות בהקמת עירוב בטבריה בס”ד.

Download (PDF, 2.2MB)

Reprinted with permission.

פרשת ויצא: ניהול הבית בדרך חרות ונחת

מה שטוב בפוליטיקה (ברירת מחדל: כמה שפחות כפיה) טוב (פחות או יותר) גם בבית ובמשפחה

פירוש השל”ה בפר’ ויצא:

וישלח יעקב ויקרא לרחל וללאה וגו’.

אין ראוי לאדם כשירצה דבר מה מאנשי ביתו שיכריחם על זה על צד האונס והנצוח, אף כי הוא מושל בהם. אבל ישתדל לפתות אותם אל מה שירצהו בתכלית מה שאפשר, כדי שיתעוררו לזה מעצמם. כי זה הוא יותר טוב משיעשו זה על צד האונס וההכרח. ראה כמה הרבה יעקב דברים עם רחל ולאה כדי שיתרצו בטוב לב, ואע”פ שהקדוש ברוך הוא ציוה לו שישוב לביתו.

תן לחכם ויחכם עוד!

Welfare for Me but Not for Thee?!

The “Rationalist Judaism” blogger posted an article attacking Kollel students living off government welfare.

Myself, I’m conflicted about the whole matter (although welfare is surely negative), so Hyehudi.org tries to give space for any well-written article on the topic, from any angle.

But one libertarian-leaning commenter called “ex-Avreich” (lightly edited by me) exposed at least the RJ blogger’s astoundingly unselfaware hypocrisy and shallowness of mind, all expressed in intemperate rhetoric:

ex-Avreich:

By “parnasa”, did you mean becoming a pseudo-“intellectual” welfare queen busy hectoring those who receive money from voluntary donors instead of sponging off taxes? Like Slifkin?!

The VAST majority of an Avreich’s income is voluntary; the vast majority of an academe parasite’s income (and incomparably larger in absolute terms) is from taxes. How does the expression about the pot calling the kettle black go? Or the one with the beam and the splinter?

Besides, the hypocrite Natan Slifkin loathes private scholars who accept ZERO government funding in Eretz Yisroel no less, if not loathing them more.

Another commenter by name of “Yosef R” responded:

Um, sure, there are a few college educated folks who go into academics. But hey, there should always be a few who go into kollel. There should be professors who get tenure, and there should be, l’havdil, baalei treisin and of course, gedolei hador.

But most people who go to advanced education do not become welfare queens or “parasites.” They work their tuchuses off at their jobs, be they in white-collar or blue collar spheres, whether they wear a white coat or a charcoal gray suit. And they create wealth and pay taxes.

Focusing on the tiny tiny fraction of those who get advanced degrees and stay in the academic world is beyond the worst “whataboutism.”

ex-Avreich:

Yeah right.

As if a monopoly degree handed out by a self-selecting elite and “licensed” overpriced text-book pubs doesn’t stop other, more qualified people and dumb down the whole profession and lead to institutional laziness (except perhaps in engineering – at least until wokeness fully blossomed), and that’s without going into revolving doors and corporate welfare…

Yosef R: I don’t think I’ll convince you so easily.

But again, I referred mainly to the tiny tiny fraction called NATAN SLIFKIN who doesn’t believe in Kollel, period! For anyone! Including avreichim who get ten shekels an hour from private donors and nothing from ‘Datot’!

And NATAN SLIFKIN wasn’t promoting trade schools but davka the Greek places with the marble columns the avreichim wiped out on chanuka (college).

NATAN SLIFKIN wants to insulate himself and his chevreh from market choices, and in the name of “intellectual freedom” hector his betters (in all senses as a group) not only in the ivy towers but also in an open medium avreichim disdain.

Nobody chooses to voluntarily fund subsidized hacks (like NATAN SLIFKIN) telling off deserving poor, unlike kollel salaries VASTLY funded by private donors (the state gives almost nothing).

And kolel is a meritocracy of ever-improving Torah teaching and writing with proven results in a virtuous spiral. While anyone who thinks the same is true of academe with its unread journals and replication crisis and failure in almost any real-world area their ideas are tried is… um, too young to listen to.

So yes, avreichim and their wives and families pay massive taxes so NATAN SLIFKIN and other parasites with too much free time can castigate them and tell them to go to college.

[Of course, we should also criticize avreichim and tell them to stop taking ANY taxes]

Postscript, the “tenure” you mention is another self-serving fraud. As are sabbaticals! Wanna guess where they DONT exist? Kolel!

The end.

Whew.

Still Imagine USA Safe for Jews?? Read this Survey

Excerpted from here:

In November, ResumeBuilder.com surveyed 1,131 U.S. hiring managers and recruiters (Note: from hereon we refer to the surveyed group exclusively as hiring managers) about their views of Jewish individuals and perception of the presence of antisemitism in the workplace.

Our findings revealed that there is an alarming amount of antisemitism within companies, a great deal of which is considered acceptable.

Key findings include:

  • 26% of hiring managers say they are less likely to move forward with Jewish applicants; top reason for negative bias is belief Jews have too much power and control
  • 26% make assumptions about whether a candidate is Jewish based on their appearance
  • 23% say they want fewer Jews in their industry
  • 17% say leadership has told them to not hire Jews
  • 33% say antisemitism is common in their workplace; 29% say antisemitism is acceptable in their company

Continue reading more here…

What’s Been, Ahem, ‘Popular’ Here Recently…

Why are they mostly in Hebrew?