Us, Do Cheshbon Hanefesh?! We’re Rabbis!

But the harshest decree was issued in 1827, when the tsar ordered that each Jewish community deliver up a quota of military recruits. Jews were to serve for twenty-five years in the military, beginning at age eighteen, but the draftable age as as low as twelve. Those under eighteen would serve in special units called Cantonist battalions until they reached eighteen, whereupon they would begin their regular quarter century of service. As if a term of army service of thirty years or more were not enough, strenuous efforts were made to convert the recruits to Russian Orthodoxy…
A double catastrophe fell on the heads of Russian Jewry: their sons would be taken away not only from their homes and families but in all likelihood also from their religion. Little wonder that all sorts of subterfuges were used in attempts to avoid military service. One can even understand the willingness of the wealthy, and of the communal officials whom they supported, to shield their own children from service by substituting others, as was allowed by law. The hapless substitutes were almost always the children of the poor and socially marginal. The decree fell upon them with especial cruelty, as they watched khapers (snatchers) employed by the community to tear their children, no less beloved though they were poor, from their arms. The oath of allegiance was taken by the recruits who were dressed in talis and tfilin… as they stood before the Holy Ark in the synagogue, and was concluded by a full range of shofar blasts. This only further embittered the recruits and their families, not only toward the tsarist regime but also toward the ‘establishment’ of the Jewish community.
From “A Century of Ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union” p. 4.
Emphasis added.

re: Mission Aside, Why Is Jacob DeHaan Considered Jewishly Respectable?

Rabbi Avi Grossman concurs on De Haan hagiography:

[R’ Sonnenfeld’s artscrollized* biography] does a superb job of rehabilitating the reputation of Jacob Israel de Haan, the secular, unrepentant, homosexual, pedophile pornographer, who, because of his anti-zionist activities, was assassinated by the Haganah, and thus became a Haredi martyr.

See the rest here…

Note: I suspect Rabbi Sonnenfeld and his collaborator were far closer to anarchists than “anti-zionists”, though this requires further research.

From Charedi wiki, Hamichlol:

כדי להרגיע את התחושות האלימות הגיב הרב זוננפלד באופן נדיר לעיתון דואר היום של איתמר בן אב”י שהפנה אליו שאלה גלויה: האם הייתה מחאה נגד הציונות בשיחה עם הלורד והאם השיחה הייתה על דעתו ובהשתתפותו. הוא השיב ואמר שאכן הפגישה הייתה בפקודתו, אם כי לא בנוכחותו. אך בשום פנים לא הובעה בה שלילה של רעיון הצהרת בלפור והקמת הבית הלאומי, שאליו יש לו יחס חיובי. כל התנגדותו היא ל”ייפוי הכוח שהציונים לוקחים על עצמם כבאי כוח לכל ישראל”.
על דברים דומים חזר דה האן. שאמר כי המשלחת מעולם לא פצתה פיה נגד רעיון שיבת העם לארצו.
ב-1924 רקם דה האן תוכנית להפגיש את הרב זוננפלד עם האמיר עבדאללה, לימים עבדאללה הראשון, מלך ירדן, כדי שאיתו יוכלו החרדים לסכם על התייחסות נבדלת אליהם. היא נועדה להבטיח התיישבות יהודית בארץ תוך ויתור על הרעיון של הקמת מדינה או ‘בית לאומי’. במכתב של הרב אברהם חיים נאה (הנודע כ”בעל השיעורים”, שהיה אז חבר בבית דינו של הרב זונפלד ואף הצטרף אליו בפגישה זו) מסופר שכדי לצאת מגבולות הארץ היה צריך הרב זוננפלד להתיר נדר וזאת “רק על פי בית דין של שלשה גדולי הדור”. אז היו בירושלים האדמו”ר מגור בעל ה”אמרי אמת”, האדמו”ר מסוקולוב הרב יצחק זליג מורגנשטרן והגאון מבענדין הרב חנוך צבי לוין, וביחד פסקו שלצורך גדול כזה מותר לו לצאת. הרב זוננפלד בירך “ברוך אשר חלק מכבודו לבשר ודם” כשפגש את מלך ירדן.
על יחס אחר מצידו לציונות, ניתן ללמוד מתיאורו של מנחם אוסישקין מראשי הציונות, על פגישתו עם הרב זוננפלד בכותל בערב ראש השנה תר”ץ, זמן קצר לאחר פרעות תרפ”ט נגד יהודי הארץ. בהיפגשם אמר הרב לאוסישקין ששימש באותם ימים כיו”ר הקק”ל: “זה לא יעזור להם (= לערבים)! אנחנו נשיג את מטרתנו. לא בסימטאות צרות ולא כפופי ראש ניכנס אל המקום הקדוש שלנו. כי אם בדרך המלך ובקומה זקופה. המשך לעבוד את עבודתך באמונה ואולי בקרוב בימינו נזכה לראות את הגאולה האמיתית”.

Funny story: I once pointed out these sort of non-conformist facts about Rabbi Sonnenfeld to a haughtily conformist great-grandson of Rabbi Sonnenfeld, and he immediately proceeded to attempt to destroy my life. Ha, good times…

Kedushas Tzion Published In American Yated Neeman

Q&A With Rav Zalman Nechemiah Goldberg on Eretz Yisrael

Are Jews in Chutz La’aretz Obligated to Move to Eretz Yisroel?

The following questions were transcribed from a phone interview of members of Agudas Kedushas Tzion with Rav Zalman Nechemiah Goldberg.

Special thanks to R’ Yoel Berman for his help preparing this article.

Download (PDF, 1.24MB)

 

‘If a White Person Is Born Blind and Has No Idea What All This Is About, Does He Get Off Easy?’

Serious questions about the rules of racism

Things are changing very quickly, and I need help understanding the new rules. I’m not making fun or being disrespectful. There are serious questions. If the group-thinkers can please clarify the following, I would be very grateful.

  1. A bi-racial couple has two sons, one black and one white. Lots of questions here! Is the white son born with white privilege, while the black son is a victim? If there is only one spot available for a school play, a summer job, an internship, etc., how should they decide who gets it? Can the white parent take away the black son’s privileges? Should the white son give his stuff to his black brother to atone for his ingrained racism? Is it appropriate for the white son to call his black brother “my brother”, or is that racially insensitive?

  2. If someone has Aunt Jemima in his pantry, what should he do with it? Can he still use it as part of a grandfather clause? Are grandfather clauses racist? Can he return it to the store for a refund or exchange, or must he assume responsibility for the act of purchasing it?

  3. If a black man has no problem with Uncle Ben’s, is he an Uncle Tom?

  4. The Bible has many racially insensitive passages. What should be done about it? What are black churches doing about it? Can the offensive passages be updated? Should there be different versions for different races?

  5. If all references to slavery are being erased, will Black History Month be shortened to a week?

  6. If a white person is born blind and has no idea what all this is about, does he get off easy?

  7. Do white illegal immigrants, or whatever they are called now, have to atone for being privileged Americans?

  8. If a black person is born inside a white body, and he identifies as black, where does he fit in?

  9. If I help find examples of racism in corporate America, can I get a cut? You know, a finder’s fee?

  10. I don’t mean to change the conversation or hijack the narrative – this is your time – but when all this is finally settled, can you tell the Germans to kneel to the Jews?

____________

www.chananyaweissman.com

https://www.facebook.com/etm.shabbatons

P.S.

I don’t think I’ll be putting this up on Facebook…
Chananya