Rabbi Malinowitz zatzal: Attribute Problems to ‘MEDINAS Yisroel’, Not ‘ERETZ Yisroel’!

Aliyah — Making It Work

I interrupt my regular programming to reproduce an e-mail exchange I had with Mishpacha magazine, part of which was printed last week in the January 19/14 Shvat issue. I reproduce it here in its entirety, for I feel its points are vital. (Special thanks to Mishpacha, for their kind permission.)

What, in your opinion, is the difference between an aliyah “success” and “failure”?

I will give answers to both meanings of your question.

1) What will determine success or failure, i.e., if the person or family stays or leaves? (THE difference is of course what Hashem has decreed for you.) In terms of a person’s hishtadlus, there seem to be two primary factors: parnassah, and the successful chinuch (and integration) of our children.

2) Assuming the person stays here, how do we determine if he’s succeeded or not? The degree to which he has become part of Israeli society while maintaining his own uniqueness; plus — and this cannot be stressed enough — whether or not he has also made an aliyah in ruchniyus, which should be the raison d’être of anyone’s aliyah.

Do you think a community such as RBS is a good model for aliyah? Or is a more integrated community preferred?

People have different opinions. Mine is that it is ideal for adults to have a place where they feel comfortable, thus enabling their aliyah, and encouraging others to do the same. But it must be done in a way that the “next generation,” their children, will feel “Israeli” (and hopefully the parents succeed at their children’s still maintaining the positive qualities of their country of origin).

Have you succeeded in building a “kehillah,” American-style? Is that something you feel is missing in Israel?

I would like to think so; but you must ask the kehillah people!

[By the way, whenever we talk about something missing here, we must careful to specify that we are talking about something missing from Medinas Yisroel, not from Eretz Yisroel (two completely different entities). Tovah ha’Aretz me’od me’od.]

What seems to me to be missing are precisely that: kehillos, where one grows as an individual, yet is also part of a larger, supportive group.

Americans also feel that a certain spirit of tolerance and broadmindedness is missing. Of course, Americans are missing plenty, too; one hopes that filling those gaps is the reason they made aliyah.

Does it make you sad when you hear that a family has decided to move back?

Of course. Living in Eretz Yisroel should be every Jew’s dream and one of his or her life’s goals.

Can you give some examples of families that could have done something different to make it here?

PLAN, PLAN, before you come. It is amazing to me that people come here and only then start looking into chinuch options for their kids, determining any special needs their kids may have, and seeing how or even if they can be met. You should start making aliyah months and months — probably a year — before you come.

And the same for parnassah options. And the same for aliyah in ruchniyus options.

What are the biggest issues facing immigrant families (we all know about parnassah, education etc. but what’s really behind it — e.g. is there a fear of integration, of lowering standards, etc.)?

Being clueless. Making unwarranted assumptions. There are so many options here, boruch Hashem, but one has to look for them (they’re in Hebrew!) and find out where and how to find them. Talk to people who are here. Israelis, Americans, English, everybody! Before you come. Do diligent research. This takes work, energy, time, ko’ach — but if you don’t do this, you’re lacking in your hishtadlus.

Most olim want to be in Israel but have no desire to be Israeli. They (we) are quite comfortable with our own identity. Do you see that as a good thing? How does it affect the kids?

I think I have already answered that. I have no problem with the oleh, because it enables and encourages aliyah, and in the best-case scenario he or she is, in any event, a foreigner in a foreign culture. But if the oleh davka avoids all things Israeli to whatever degree he or she can, that person is doing a grave disservice to the next generation, who will have an identity crises of who he is, where he belongs, etc. Not a good thing.

What are the big issues that congregants come to you with?

The overwhelming majority come with personal, social work-type issues, that have nothing to do with being an oleh per se. They run the gamut: shalom bayis, chinuch banim, self-esteem, sheilas…

Obviously, it is through the prism of being an oleh. But it annoys me to no end when aliyah is blamed for problems these people would obviously (to me) be facing anywhere they lived! If it weren’t aliyah, it would be other issues, unique to chutz la’AretzTovah ha’Aretz me’od me’od!

After that, it is the unique issues they face in chinuch habanim.

Now for a personal question: Are American rabbanim who come here held up to their former stature, or does the Israeli Torah community not give them their due kavod? How is your kavod level?

My kavod level is, and has always been, way beyond what I deserve!

Anyone wishing to serve Hashem, and His People, in any capacity, needs a heavy dose of Sha’ar Yichud Hama’aseh in the sefer Chovos Halevavos, where he teaches us how to do things lishmah, and let the kavod and thank-you chips fall where they may.

Now for the biggie: Is living in Israel even optional? Can a Torah family or individual just decide “if it’s for him,” or is there a religious/spiritual imperative for everyone to try to get here?

There is a religious imperative for everyone to see if it seems feasible, and then to ask their own spiritual mentor and be guided by that person. Sometimes it will be a psak, sometimes an eitzah.

I do know some success stories, though, where they did NOT listen to their rav or mentor’s advice, and came. But in general, of course, one should be guided by their spiritual guide.

It must be stated, though, that in every case I have heard of in which the gedolim here in Eretz Yisroel have been consulted by a potential oleh, the answer was invariably: Come, come, it will im yirtzeh Hashem all work out!

Thank you for allowing me to clarify things in my own mind!

From BTYA, here.

All Attending Funerals for Torah Scholars: The Question Is Better Than the Answers

Leaving Learning For Levayos

by Rabbi Yehuda Spitz

In Parshas Vayechi we are told of the colossal levayah (funeral) for YaakovAvinu, from Egypt all the way up to his final resting place, Ma’aras HaMachpella in Chevron. Indeed, the respect and honor accorded to Yaakov Avinu on his passing was universal, and we find that even the Canaanite Kings, no friends of Bnei Yisrael, nonetheless joined in the massive levayah[1].

Although we cannot fathom such a gathering for a funeral, nevertheless, the recent spate of Levayos for Gedolim that engendered public turnout in the hundreds of thousands of mourners has left even the most jaded of secular pundits speechless. The passing of such Gaonim as Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv zt”l, Rav Nosson Tzvi Finkel zt”l, Rav Chaim Pinchas Scheinberg zt”lmv”r Rav Yaakov Blau zt”l, the Vizhnitzer Rebbe zt”l, and Rav Ovadia Yosef zt”l, over the last several years, has exemplified how much of a priority it is for us to pay our respect and show our esteem and reverence for these luminaries, as testament to their vast accomplishments as Gedolei HaDor.

Their vastly different backgrounds and constituents notwithstanding, each of these giants’ Levayos had attendance well into the tens and hundred thousands, consisting of the full spectrum of religious Jewry.

Indeed, the rewards for attending a levayah, and not just for Gedolim, are many. In fact, this Gemillas Chessed Shel Emes is referred to as a mitzvah that is ‘keren kayemes l’olam haba’ah’, an eternal one with rewards both in This World and the World to Come, with no diminished returns[2].

Deceased’s Needs Fulfilled?

Yet, we find that according to the Gemara and codified as halacha, although ‘Talmud Torah Kenneged Kulam’, Torah study is the greatest of all Mitzvos[3], nevertheless, one is obligated to leave his Torah study in order to properly escort one who has passed on[4].

Although the Gemara qualifies this rule, and asserts that it is relevant only to one who does not have ‘kol tzorcho’, his required needs, nowadays this is fulfilled with a ‘Chevra Kadisha’, a Burial Society, and one should not abandon his Torah study to attend a random levayah when basic requirements are being met[5].

However, continues the Gemara, different people have different needs regarding their levayos. A basic minyan is deemed sufficient only for one who is not learned[6]. Yet, for one who is learned, his basic needs for a levayah is an astounding 600,000 attendees, the same number as those present at Kabbolas HaTorah! This is due to the dictum of ‘Netilasah K’Nisinasah’; the same number present at Kabbolas HaTorah should be present when the Torah departs, meaning when one who is filled with Torah passes away.

Lest one think that this halacha is referring to a Gadol HaDor or at the very least, a famous Rosh Yeshiva, the Rema explains that in his time, anyone with at least a rudimentary Jewish education (in Chumash and Mishna) is included in this category! Although the Aruch Hashulchan felt that this was possibly only true in the Rema’s time, conversely, the Minchas Elazar of Munkacs remarked that in his day (around 85 years ago) this was certainly true; as ‘who doesn’t sit in shul over Shabbos and recite shnayim mikra v’echad targum?!”[7]

The Gemara concludes that for one who teaches Torah to others, also not referring exclusively to a Gadol Hador or Rosh Yeshiva, but even a RebbiRavPosekMaggid Shiur, or Rosh Chaburah, there is no limit, and everyone is obligated to attend his levayah[8]!

Limud or Levayah?

If so, why do we find such numbers of mourners only at Gedolim’s levayos? In large cities wouldn’t everyone be required to stop their talmud Torah many times a day, simply to escort their fellow man, whom they may not have ever met, to his eternal rest?

Although there are several approaches and rationales given to answer this question, it is important to note that many Gedolim grappled with this issue, implying that the question is still better than the answer[9].

Continue reading…

From Ohr.edu, here.

Anti-Israel Libertarians Are MASSIVE Hypocrites

Top Ten Things That Piss Me Off About Anti Israel Libertarians

These issues are usually in my subconscious. Recent events have brought them out to my conscious thought. I don’t like discussing this stuff in general because these are Jewish issues and what non Jews think doesn’t concern me. But I’ve been brought in to the fold, so here are my thoughts.

  1. Anti Israel libertarians say settlements are immoral because they are not annexed by the State of Israel, even though settling land is the crux of the entire libertarian homesteading theory, and libertarians are against states annexing anything in the first place.
  2. Statist institutions and instruments like the UN and “international law,” suddenly become relevant and important regarding what these institutions say about Israel, even though they are despised and ignored and reviled in every single other case.
  3. Anti Israel libertarians rail against the “ethnic cleansing” of “Palestine” while they simultaneously egg on the actual ethnic cleansing of Judea and Samaria of Jews, because “settlements” are “illegal” according to “international law” and should all be evacuated. I wonder what John Locke would say about THAT.
  4. Libertarians hold that homesteading is the way one comes to own property, yet anti-Israel libertarians like Jeremy Hammond can hold, only in the case of Israel, that it is legitimate to own UNhomesteaded land just because some statist body says that uncultivable land can be “owned”.

Continue reading…

From THE JEWISH LIBERTARIAN, here.

January 18: Rabbi Bar Chaim Delivering Torah Class in Boro Park

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim Arriving in the U.S.: Shiur in Brooklyn on January 18

FRIDAY, 10 JANUARY 2020 10:42

The head of Machon Shilo, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim will be speaking at 8:45 on Jan. 18, Motzaei Shabbath Shemoth at Cong. Avraham Utzvi Hirsh which is located at:

4322 16th Ave
Borough Park
Brooklyn, N.Y.

The event is open for men and women.

From Machon Shilo, here.

Manufacturing Consent: The Story of Avishai Raviv

Israeli Government uses PsyOps on Settlers

This week (January 25, 2005) the Israeli PsyOps division was reassembled after being largely dormant for five years.14

– Amos Harel, Haaretz Military Correspondent

PsyOps or Psychological Warfare Operations1 are units of the military2 designed to swing public opinion.  You can think of them as Public Relations persons for the Military.3  They are similar to commercial and political “spin doctors”.  Political “spin doctors” put a ‘spin’ on media events to show their product or political agenda in the most positive light.

Where PsyOps differ, however, is if the current events are insufficient for their needs they are prepared to create their own ‘events’.   Special agents known as ‘provocateurs’ are trained to blend in with the crowd, dress as civilians, and show up at carefully coordinated times with the camera crews to create a media ‘happening’.

The last time Israel was assumed to have organized a PsyOps unit was to help sell the Oslo peace plan to the general public.  The bold plan put forth, for the first time, a two state solution for the Mideast conflict.  It was a wonderful plan to lead to lasting peace in the region.  Former Prime Minister Shimon Peres envisioned economic prosperity for all, even to the point where Israel might become a member of its arch enemy, the Arab League.4

This plan went against years of Israeli government policy and public opinion.  It was a hard sell.  It faced two major obstacles. First, the promised ‘peace and understanding’ with the Palestinians was never realized. Second, because approximately 10% of the Israeli population lives over the green line,5 a significant percentage of these people would have to be moved.

The Israeli Government tried its best to put a good face on the Oslo agreement, and among other things assembled a group of the best and brightest in Israeli Public Relations (PR) to work as a branch of the military “PsyOps”.

Their first task was to deal with “no promised peace”.  Israel fully expected that by withdrawing from Lebanon, allowing the creation of a self governing Palestinian Authority with its own police and security forces, and giving it full control of 98% of the Palestinian population — it would ‘shock the Arab world’ into taking a new, positive view of the Israel.  The Palestinians would be happy, Europe and the United Nations would cease to condemn Israel, and Israel would be on the road to living side by side with a friendly Palestinian state.  But this didn’t happen.  Suicide bombings began to occur monthly and drive-by shootings increased to almost daily frequency.  Prime Minister Barak who wanted to give 25%, 33%, 50%80% and lastly 95%.6 of the West Bank and Gaza was viciously maligned by the Arab press – more so than any previous Israeli PM.  European anti-Israel sentiment reached a zenith, and antisemitism began to reappear after being dormant for years.  Things weren’t going as planned.  So then Prime Minister Rabin, respun terrorist victims as ‘sacrifices for peace’.  Terrorist attacks went unreported or explained away.  Terror victims were minimally interviewed on the local news, and never on the international news.  The head of the Palestinian Authority, Arafat was made to look a peace loving leader who was diligently fighting terrorism.  A desperate Israel turned a blind eye to the ‘education of hatred’ and glorification of suicide bombers rampant in the Palestinian schools7 and media8.

The second task was to deal with ‘labeling’ the segment of Israeli population which would be need to be relocated as ‘outside the national consensus’.  The West Bank and Gaza ‘settlers’ became ‘opponents of peace’, ‘extremists’, and for merely holding on to what had been Israeli government policy for years, they were labeled ‘dangerous radicals’.  But names weren’t enough, actions were needed.  In one highly publicized event, Israeli secret agent and provocateur, Avishai Raviv, brought in Channel 2 news to film a faked ‘secret swearing in ceremony’ of a imaginary settler terrorist organization “Eyal”.9  Raviv was also instrumental in printing and distributing posters of PM Rabin in a Nazi uniform.10  Raviv looked and acted like a settler, and the public outcry against the settlers reached unprecedented proportions.  The truth is we would never have known that one of the most extreme settlers was really an Israeli secret agent if he hadn’t become a good friend of Yigal Amir.  This is the same Yigal Amir who assassinated PM Yitzak Rabin.  Although Raviv originally denied under oath that he was a secret agent, and the government disclaimed any possible linkage between Raviv’s incitement and Amir’s actions, the Israeli public demanded answers about their connection.  The Shamgar Commission was established and determined publicly that Raviv was indeed an agent and that he had been involved in staging a series of fake ‘ultra rightwing’ extremist actions.  Charges were brought against Raviv, but in a closed door court session, and under the guise of state security, all charges were eventually dropped.  But much worse than that, the effect of government sponsored ‘spin’ against a segment of the Israeli population was never measured or explored, and the Israeli public was left with the impression that ‘all settlers are extremists’.

Even after the Rabin assassination, the PsyOps continued their work.  It was assumed by many that the “Kill Barak” website.11 was a PsyOps operation to further alienate the public against anyone opposed to advancing the Oslo accords.  It appears that the same webmaster also ran a discussion group at webseers.com12 where for the first time all sorts of ‘anonymous’ information appeared creating a bizarre conspiracy theory blaming the Rabin assassination on pro-Olso politicians, the Council for Foreign Relations and UFOs.  This conspiracy theory (without the UFOs) gained a lot of attention in the Israeli media and led the Israeli public to think that people opposed to Oslo are nuts.  When this discussion group went offline during Israeli elections, it was assumed that there was a connection.  It is against Israeli law for a government organization to influence elections, so several discussion group members speculated that the PsyOps had taken the discussion group down so that it not appear that they were directly affecting election results.  We don’t know.  We probably will never know.

After the Olso agreement turned into the Olso war, there was little indication of PsyOps activity.  Israeli anathematized Arafat.  The official channels began to complain about incitement in Palestinian schools and media.  The world began to see and hear about terrorist victims.13

But when the PM Ariel Sharon resurrected the spirit of Oslo (which is basically an Israeli retreat) in the form of his policy of ‘Disengagement’, he once again hit a potentially hard sell with the Israeli public.  Normally when a country redraws its borders, the residents remain where they are.  In a bold step, Sharon insists that the Jewish residents of Gaza and portions of the West Bank be expelled.  He has even threatened to use military force against Israeli civilians who wish to remain in their homes in Gaza and the West Bank.  New legislation requiring up to three years in prison for anyone who resists evacuation is being pushed through the Knesset.  Sharon has claimed that by the end of the year 2005, “Gaza will be free of Jews” – a phrase that upset a portion of the Israeli public being reminiscent of phrases used during WWII.  As time past, Sharon hit more and more resistance to his policies.

This week (January 25, 2005) the PsyOps division was reassembled after being largely dormant for five years.14  When I hear that there is a “truce in Gaza” and “absolute quiet” from the Government and Israeli Media, yet I see from the local news that the mortar attacks and bombings are actually still continuing15 — it seems to me the PsyOps and spin doctors are hard at work.  When several individual provocateurs (supposably Israeli settlers from Gaza) slash tires and throw rocks at Palestinian Police who sent to keep quiet in the area AND the next day the Israeli papers run the headlines “Settlers destroy peace and quiet in Gaza”, as if the settlers are somehow to blame for the subsequent mortar attacks and shellings — more PsyOps.  When the government decides to evict two families and destroy two caravans in the middle of ten year old village in Yitzhar on the West Bank, provoking a scuffle with the residents AND leading to headlines of “Extremist settlers attack Police and Army” — It appears to me and many others that the Israeli government staged an event to further its policies.  I am outraged to think of the Israeli government using PsyOps on its own population, and demand a full and complete inquiry.

It is the nature of secret services that we cannot know the full extent of their activities.  But Israeli Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein hinted at its scope when he tried to suppress16 documents attesting to Avishai Raviv role17 as a government paid agent provocateur against its own citizens. He said if the public knew [the truth about the Government actions] it would be a grave danger to public security, faith in the government, and public order.

Continue reading…

From EretzYisroel.org, here.