Ron Paul on Government Manipulation of Social Media

The ‘Twitter Papers’ Reveal the Totalitarians Among Us

I admit to being skeptical of Elon Musk as a free speech hero. He has moved from one US government-subsidized business to another on his path to becoming the world’s richest person. But there is no denying that his release of the “Twitter Papers” this past weekend, which blew the lid off government manipulation of social media, has been a huge victory for those of us who value the First Amendment.

The release, in coordination with truly independent journalist Matt Taibbi, demonstrated indisputably how politicians and representatives of “official Washington” pressed the teams that were then in charge of censorship at Twitter to remove Tweets and even ban accounts that were guilty of nothing beyond posting something the power-brokers did not want the general public to read. Let’s not forget that many of those demanding Twitter censorship were US government officials who had taken an oath to the US Constitution and its First Amendment.

It is important to understand that both US political parties were involved in pushing Twitter to censor information they didn’t like. There is plenty of corruption to go around. However, as the Twitter Papers demonstrated, vastly more Tweets were censored at the demand of Democratic Party politicians simply because Twitter employees on the censorship team were overwhelmingly Democratic Party supporters.

Perhaps the most damning piece of evidence released in this first installment of the Twitter Papers was a series of Tweets from the Biden 2020 campaign to its contact inside Twitter asking that the social media censor them. An internal Twitter document shows that the censor team “handled these,” meaning censored them.

Elon Musk himself openly stated before the release that, prior to his taking control of the company and engaging in mass firing, Twitter had been manipulating elections. So all those years we heard lies from the Washington elites that Russia was interfering in our elections when after all it was Twitter. Of course that raises the question about other large social media companies like Facebook. Will Mark Zuckerberg come clean about his own company’s election interference? Will anyone have the courage to demand that he do so?

How did they get away with all of this? As another truly independent journalist, Glenn Greenwald, pointed out on the Tucker Carlson show the night the “Twitter Papers” were released, while it was once controversial for the CIA to attempt to manipulate what Americans consume in the mainstream media, nowadays these outlets openly hire “former” US intelligence leaders and officers as news analysts. CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and the rest of them all bring on “former” members of the intelligence services to tell Americans what to think. “Big tech censorship is a critical tool of the national security state,” Greenwald told Tucker. “Whenever anyone tries to do anything about it these former people from the CIA and the Pentagon and the rest jump up and say ‘we cannot allow you to restore free speech.’”

This is a corruption scandal so massive that it is almost guaranteed to never be properly investigated. Government itself is among the most guilty and we know “government commissions” are really about covering up rather than uncovering the crimes committed. But the truth is powerful. Some 58 years after the Warren Report whitewashed the assassination of President Kennedy, polls show that few Americans believe the “official” narrative.

Truth is powerful and we must always seek it. No amount of lies can withstand the disinfectant of truth. Thanks to Elon Musk for his courage and we encourage him to continue.

From LRC, here.

מה ההבדל? ‘אומר מותר’ של שומר מצוות ו’אומר מותר’ של חילוני

ז”ל הגרש״ז אויערבך זצ״ל (מנחת שלמה נדרים כ״ח א’), מתוך ההקדמה לס’ סלע מדינה שהבאנו כאן (לא ראיתי בפנים):

״נכון להדגיש, שאף אם אנו אומרים שאין שייך דינא דמלכותא כיום, אין בזה משום חילול השם, שהרי החפשים וכו’ אומרים בפירוש שמחמת הדת אין שום פחד לנגד עיניהם, וא״כ אותו הדבר אומרים גם שומרי התורה, כי הרי אין אנו אומרים שמצד הדת הננו חייבים לעבור על הדינים, רק אומרים שמותר, ודבר זה הרי כל החפשים ג״כ אומרים כך”.

אבל באמת החילונים רק משקרים את עצמם כאילו לית דין ולית דיין. רובא דרובא הוא באמת “יהודי בלב”, א”כ נמצא כאילו הוא בעל דרך ארץ “מן הישוב” ואילו ההוא גברא שמשים ודאי כספק ופורץ גדרי עולם כמה מכוערין דרכיו וכו’ וכו’.

ועוד, שהם טוענים שיש מוסר כפרני “במקום” משפטי התורה, אלא שאיננו מקבלים אותו, א”כ יצאנו קרחים מכאן ומכאן, וכאילו באנו מקדושה חמורה לקדושה קלה לפי דעתם. א”כ, ההלכה מוחקת את ה”מוסר הטבעי“.

ועוד, דאפילו מ”ש “אין אנו אומרים שמצד הדת הננו חייבים לעבור על הדינים” רחוק מלהיות אמת, כי אין  “רשות” מוחלטת.

(ובכלל, כל הסברות-כרס-ללא-ראיה של הרש”ז אויערבאך מאד חשודות בעיני, ואכמ”ל.)

אבל י”ל דבאמת כשאין שייך דינא דמלכותא כיום אין זה אילוץ מבלי מלח, ורשעים הללו צריכים לבא במערות צרים ובמחלות עפר מרוב פחד ובושה מהסדרת הברבריות. והמדינה בימינו בכל מקום היא היפך המוסר הטבעי ג”כ.

אדרבא, אם אמרינן דינא דמלכותא גם בזה”ז באיזה מקום או איזה ציור, ה”ז כמעט דבר התמוה לרבים, ולא תהא תורה שלמה שלנו כשיחה בטלה שלהם, וק”ל.

Nassim Taleb: The ‘Lecturing Birds How to Fly’ Effect

Found in the brickyard here (this may be in one of his books, too):

TYPE 1TYPE 2
Know howKnow what
Fat Tony wisdom, Aristotelian phronesisAristotelian logic
Implicit , TacitExplicit
Nondemonstrative knowledgeDemonstrative knowledge
TëchnëEpistemë
Experiential knowledgeEpistemic base
HeuristicPropositional knowledge
FigurativeLiteral
TinkeringDirected research
BricolageTargeted activity
EmpiricismRationalism
PracticeScholarship
EngineeringMathematics
Tinkering, stochastic tinkeringDirected search
Epilogism (Menodotus of Nicomedia and the school of empirical medicine)Inductive knowledge
Historia a sensate cognitioCausative historiography
AutopsiaDiagnostic
Austrian economicsNeoclassical economics
Bottom up libertarianismCentral Planner
Spirit of the LawLetter of the Law
CustomsIdeas
Brooklyn, AmiounCambridge, MA, and UK
Accident, trial and errorDesign
NonautisticAutistic
RandomDeterministic
Ecological uncertainty, not tractable in textbookLudic probability, statistics textbooks
EmbeddedAbstract
Parallel processingSerial processing
Off-modelOn-model, model based
Side effect of a drugNational Institute of Health
NominalismRealism

But how come Taleb doesn’t mention Brisk\Chazon Ish?!

By the way, see this.

VAYISHLACH: Yes, Judaism Believes in Rape-Victim Blame[-Shar]ing!

Two Powerful Lessons Revealed by Dinah’s Ordeal in Parshat Vayishlach

21/11/2018

​In Parshat Vayishlach, Dinah Bat Yaakov undergoes a horrific ordeal.

Many layers of insights and deeper meanings (including rectifications and gilgulim) are revealed within this episode, but we’re just going to focus on gleaning 2 lessons from one aspect of it: Dinah’s behavior & dress.

Chazal point out that Dinah left her family’s secure area to go out to see the Canaanite females, which is how Shechem saw her and managed to abduct her in the first place. Also, her sleeve accidentally went up, exposing her elbow.

If you, like me, grew up with feminist brainwashing, you initially find this insight offensive.

​Blaming the victim! How dare they?!

But that’s not what Chazal is doing.

 

Lesson #1: Please Protect Your Precious Self

​First of all, Dinah inherited her mother’s yatzanit trait; Leah Imeinu was otherwise exceptionally modest and saintly. But nobody’s perfect. Either way, an inherited trait is not Dinah’s fault.

Secondly, Dinah and Yosef Hatzaddik switched souls, which is why he possessed certain feminine attributes and Dinah possessed certain masculine attributes.

​(Initially, Leah Imeinu was going to birth Yosef Hatzaddik, but in her great compassion and righteousness, she prayed for a girl so that her sister Rachel Imeinu would be equal to Zilpah & Bilha in the number of Tribes produced.)

So the fact that Dinah possessed certain masculine tendencies that led her to take this risk is definitely not Dinah’s fault.

So this is the first lesson: Ladies, you need to protect yourselves.

This is the opposite of feminist ideology, which insists that you have the right NOT to protect yourself.

But here’s your real right: You have the RIGHT to protect yourself.

In fact, it’s even an obligation to protect yourself.

​That’s from the Torah, not from me.

Yet as we all know, protective measures like modest behavior and modest dress are not full-proof.

Nothing is fool-proof.

Bomb shelters can be bombed. Locks can be picked.

But we enter bomb shelters anyway. We lock our doors anyway.

Why? Because it’s good hishtadlut.

And because Judaism loves women, it encourages women to at least make efforts toward self-protection.

Because of feminist propaganda, women and girls in America are discouraged from taking proper measures to protect themselves. This dumbing-down of the American female has reaped terrible consequences for girls and women.

In response to the growing number of assaults and harassment against young women, some caring tough guys formed a website (No-Nonsense Self-Defense) to give females—particularly college-aged women—sensible advice for self-protection.

They discovered that despite feminist blather about female “rights!” to behave however and go wherever they want, such conduct usually ignited or escalated a threatening encounter, resulting in a full assault against the woman.

While feminist snarkiness and “grrrrl” characters in books and movies display female feistiness as the desirable and victorious trait, studies reveal that this same feistiness often precedes a violent encounter.

Meaning, 80% of violent encounters were preceded by the young woman using INEFFECTIVE violence when striking out against her potential assailant.

In other words, despite media brainwashing, real-life feisty girls are more likely to lose when faced with a predatory male.

Continue reading…

From Myrtle Rising, here.