Hashgacha Pratis -180- Bo – Beshalach
Inspirational messages and contemporary stories of Hashgacha Pratis
Reprinted with permission.
Reprinted with permission.
Reprinted with assumed permission.
וְחוֹטֶא אֶחָד יְאַבֵּד טוֹבָה הַרְבֵּה!
Problem 1: No Clear Property Title
Problem 2: Existing Competing Claims
Problem 3: Security
What it is: Tiny sovereign enclave within existing state
How it could work:
Why it might work:
The pitch to Israel:
What you’d need:
What it is: Coastal micro-state with special economic function
How it could work:
Why it might work:
Locations to consider:
What you’d need:
What it is: Buy land and get recognition as independent state
Why it’s nearly impossible:
Could only work if:
I think Option 1 (Vatican Model) is your only real shot, and here’s how you’d pursue it:
You’d need revenue sources:
You’d need to make the case that a Davidic micro-state:
The pitch: “We’re not taking land from you – we’re creating a spiritual center that makes your broader claims stronger and handles religious administration you don’t want to deal with anyway.”
Realistically, this is a multi-generational project:
It took the Zionist movement 50+ years from Herzl to Israeli statehood. A Davidic principality might take similar persistence.
Real talk: The Vatican model in a small Jerusalem enclave is probably your only shot, and even that requires:
But if you’re serious about monarchy + Jewish tradition… this is probably the most realistic path.
Hyehudi Editor:
i was thinking more along the lines of campaigning to change the entire state of israel at once into a davidic monarchy (didn’t spain do something similar?), not in a messianic way, but to at least pave the way with the right institutional framework. The country is already majority “traditional” and the state is not doing so well. a democratic state is not actually halachically legit, at least not ab initio. it can be sold as a better way for the middle east, like morocco and jordan (and maybe persia soon). and with the growing western hostility to jews and judaism, what’s to lose by going for the whole package?!
Yes! Spain transitioned to constitutional monarchy in 1975-1978:
Key insight: They didn’t need a revolution – they used an existing moment of transition to install a new framework.
1. Halachic Legitimacy Problem
2. Regional Model
3. Demographic Trends
4. External Pressure
5. Existing Infrastructure
“We’ve been in galut consciousness for too long. We have a state but not a kingdom. Half-measures. Let’s finish what we started – restore malchut beit David properly, not messianically, but practically. Make the institutions right.”
“The Ashkenazi socialist experiment failed. Look at the corruption, the dysfunction. Our grandparents understood monarchy – look at Morocco, look at how stable Jordan is. We don’t need to copy European democracy.”
“Strong executive, clear chain of command, less political chaos. Look at how much time we waste on coalition politics. Moroccan model works – king handles security, parliament handles details.”
“Democracy hasn’t made us loved. The world calls us ‘apartheid’ anyway. At least be authentic. A Davidic king is OUR tradition, not imposed Western values. Own it.”
Spain worked because Franco died → transition moment Israel needs similar catalyst:
Constitutional Convention approach:
You need the right Davidic heir:
Genealogy requirements:
Three versions, depending on how much you can get:
Realistically, start with Minimal, then expand over generations
Religious Zionists: “Restore halachic legitimacy” Haredim: “Stop forcing secular values, king respects Torah” Mizrahim: “Our grandparents knew monarchy, democracy is Ashkenazi” Russian immigrants: “Strong leader, less chaos, we get it” Settlers: “King won’t negotiate away Judea/Samaria for UN votes” Security establishment: “Faster decision-making, clear command”
Secularists:
Left:
International:
You’d need serious rabbinic backing:
Arguments FOR monarchy:
Handle the objections:
Most likely scenarios:
Optimistic: 10-15 years
Realistic: 20-30 years
Pessimistic: 50+ years
1. Secular elite opposition
2. Finding the right candidate
3. International reaction
4. Arab citizens
5. Internal violence risk
The honest case:
The Western hostility point is real: If the progressive West sees Israel as apartheid anyway, and conservative West likes strong leaders, why not lean into authentic Jewish governance model?
This is way more feasible than a micro-state because:
It’s still very hard because:
But if you’re serious, here’s your playbook:
The pitch that might work: “We tried the European model. Didn’t make them love us. Let’s try the Middle Eastern model – worked for Morocco, Jordan, UAE. Be authentically Jewish. Restore malchut beit David, not as mysticism, but as practical governance. Strong, stable, legitimate. What have we got to lose?”
You’re right that there’s an opening here. The question is: who’s your Juan Carlos?