Hyehudi Building Cadre Slowly

What was popular over the last 31 days (from Google Analytics):

  1. מעט מן האור דוחה הרבה מן החושך – מקור הפתגם
  2. ספר שדי תפוחים – שני חלקים: אוצר תיקוני עוונות
  3. Rabbi Lazer Brody shlita Abandoned Berland-Supporting Shalom Arush LONG AGO!
  4. ה’דעת תורה’ בעיתון יתד נאמן נגד הכרזת ריבונות מדינית על א”י
  5. ספר ‘מענה לאגרות’ נגד שו”ת אגרות משה
  6. Did You Know Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan’s ‘Living Torah’ Is Online?
  7. תמחה את זכר עמלק – שיר
  8. Are Chaim Walder’s Family Innocent?
  9. FREE: Download ‘Making of a Godol’ Here!
  10. בתורתו של רבי גדליה נדל – להורדה חינם
  11. Agudath Israel of America ACTUALLY Provoking the Goyim
  12. re: ‘Tze’i Lach B’ikvei Hatzon’ Is Harder Than You Think! (Recommended)

By the way, the book בתורתו של רבי גדליה נדל itself seems to be a “sleeper hit” (other sites carry the PDF file as well).

Those Mad Marxists Can’t Take a Break!

Every moment is an organizing opportunity, every person a potential activist, every minute a chance to change the world.

Dolores Huerta

Just kidding… I agree, of course.

The Cause is everything (not Marxism, though)!

REMINDER: Don’t ‘Sell Chametz’ No Matter What!

When I present people with the case against the sham and Chillul Hashem and grievous error known as “Mechiras Chametz”, a common last refuge is bringing up the Bittul.

It’s only a rabbinic problem (not that there’s any הם אמרו והם אמרו), even if the sale is a complete farce, they contend, since everyone does Bittul Chametz, anyway.

Besides (in a seeping, sweeping self-reckoning), do I even sell Chametz Gamur? (Well, oh right, the whiskey and Marmite and VWXYZ…)

Rabbi Yitzchak Brand responds (abbreviated and paraphrased from his landmark treatment):
How can someone declare they regard any Chametz still left in their possession as worthless if they are also actively selling that same Chametz?! (It makes not a whit of difference when the “sale” and Bittul occur, or if he does the Bittul both before and after — unless he buys his Chametz back before Pesach; it is davka the Bittul that suffers here.)
“I want this utterly worthless Chametz begone yesterday! But I also think it’s worth good money…”
Don’t say: “OK, well, it can’t hurt”!

 

Actually, even though the sale is invalid, it does have the negative effect of canceling out the Bittul, since the seller announces that he does desire the Chametz, and that no one may go near it without actual full payment, etc. (whether Bittul is working on Hefker or on משוי כעפרא). (Also, see the Rishonim here p.40-44.) So, the Torah prohibitions of holding on to Chametz on Pesach do not become derabbanan!

 

There is no middle ground with a sale. Either the personal property belongs to the seller, or it transfers title to the buyer: ובלבד שיתננו לו במתנה גמורה. It’s not a Matana. It’s not even hefker. Meaning the Chametz is still in your possession and Mede’oraisa.

 

Those rabbis going around with the Goy for surprise visits on Chol Hamo’ed still have the Goy pay for the Chametz he takes. (So what if it isn’t Chamas? Even a shopkeeper has the obligation of “Tashbisu”.)

 

OY VEY!

 

If you can’t bear the monetary loss of keeping the Torah, better שב ואל תעשה thereby merely transgressing the original Torah prohibitions than to both transgress the original Torah prohibitions and also add the horrible, terrible, no good, and very bad “Sale” of your soul.

 

Never “sell” the Torah. But don’t forget to remove [actualChametz (including flour) from your possession!

ציטוט השבוע בויקיטסט

   “אָיֹם וְנוֹרָא הוּא מִמֶּנּוּ מִשְׁפָּטוֹ וּשְׂאֵתוֹ יֵצֵא” (חבקוק א, ז)

נגד מה שאמר שנורא הוא, אומר שממנו משפטו יצא, רוצה לומר, שהוא אינו נוהג לפי חקת המשפט הקבועים. שיש משפטים קבועים בין העמים והמלכים, שאין למלך או לעם להתגר מלחמה על עם אשר לא חטא כנגדו, וכל-שכן אם הוא נכנע תחתיו, והם נימוסים קבועים לכל העמים. אבל הוא לא יביט על משפטי המדינות וחוקיהם, רק יקבע לו משפטים כפי רצונו, להסיר גבולות עמים, ולהרעיש ארצות; ועל-כן מתיראים מפניו.

– מלבי”ם על חבקוק א ז

Rothbard Was a System Builder

Rothbard as System-Builder: A Tribute

An abridged version of this essay was printed in Liberty magazine.

by Wendy McElroy

Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) — the greatest libertarian theorist of the 20th century — expressed what he considered to be the central political issue confronting mankind. He wrote, “My own basic perspective on the history of man…is to place central importance on the great conflict which is eternally waged between Liberty and Power.” Liberty v. Power. In its most blatant form, the struggle manifests itself as war between the peaceful, productive individual and the intrusive State that usurps those products. The tension between freedom and authority is hardly a new subject for political commentary. But Rothbard managed to bring a newness to everything he touched intellectually.

Rothbard was a system builder. Unsatisfied with past attempts to present a ‘philosophy of freedom,’ Rothbard sought to create an interdisciplinary system of thought that used the struggle between Liberty and Power as its integrating theme. He explained, “Strands and remnants of libertarian doctrines are, indeed, all around us. … But only libertarianism takes these strands and remnants and integrates them into a mighty, logical, and consistent system.” Without such a systematic world view, he believed Liberty could not succeed.

In forty-five years of scholarship and activism, Rothbard produced over two dozen books and thousands of articles that made sense of the world from a radical individualist perspective. In doing so, it is no exaggeration to say that Rothbard created the modern libertarian movement. Specifically, he refined and fused together:

  • natural law theory, using a basic Aristotelian or Randian approach;
  • the radical civil libertarianism of 19th century individualist-anarchists, especially Lysander Spooner and Benjamin Tucker;
  • the free market philosophy of Austrian economists, in particular Ludwig von Mises, into which he incorporated sweeping economic histories; and,
  • the foreign policy of the American Old Right — that is, isolationism.

As a result of the fusion, libertarianism blossomed in the ’60s as the philosophy of absolute individual rights based on natural law — of rights that were expressed domestically through the free market and internationally through non-aggression (isolationism) with its corollary of unbridled free trade. But more than this. Following in the footsteps of his mentor, the pioneering Austrian Economist Ludwig von Mises, Rothbard grounded human liberty in human nature. Developing an explicit philosophy of Liberty, he drove his insights through history to re-examine the real implications and meaning of events, such as the American Revolution. He laid a moral foundation for freedom, then used it to springboard into a strategy by which to achieve it. The integration was a stunning accomplishment. And one that stirred the love of Liberty within a generation of scholars and activists who proudly called themselves ‘Rothbardians.’ I include myself in those ranks.

Continue reading here…