Dr. Seuss: ‘For Drowning You Were Drowned’

Leave Dr. Seuss for Dead

One of the most prominent children’s book authors of the 20th century, Dr. Seuss, suffered a double blow to his legacy this month. His estate said they would no longer publish six of his children’s books that contained depictions of Africans and Asians that are “hurtful and wrong.” The Biden administration followed by unceremoniously dumping all of the doctor’s books from its annual “Read Across America Day” book list.
Conservatives tore their shirts in anguish over yet another example of cancel culture and political correctness gone mad. Fox News ran segments lamenting the left’s suppression of Dr. Seuss all day on March 2. “People are too scared,” Fox & Friends co-host Ainsely Earhardt said. “The places we are going in this country right now!”
It is ironic to see members of the right run to the defense of the dear doctor, who himself was one of his era’s greatest cancelers of conservatives. Dr. Seuss was the lead cartoonist during the interwar years for PM, a leftist New York daily tabloid dominated by Communist fellow travelers. He routinely used his post to smear conservatives opposed to the Roosevelt administration as racists and anti-Semites, and the paper’s editorialists aggressively lobbied Roosevelt’s government to shut down conservative media.
Moreover, in his role at PM, Dr. Seuss was one of the most effective propagandists advocating for war and internationalist foreign policies committing American troops and treasure abroad. An enemy of the original “America First” conservative populist movement, Dr. Seuss was not just an advocate for America’s early entry into WWII, but for a permanent internationalist foreign policy posture after WWII, and for the re-education of people worldwide into the ideals of American democracy.
Dr. Seuss was the pen name of Theodor Seuss Geisel, son of an evangelical Lutheran family in Massachusetts who adopted radical leftist politics in his youth and honed his craft as a persuasive artist, first as a well-paid ad man for the oil industry, and then as the premier cartoonist for PM. According to Richard H. Minear’s book Dr. Seuss Goes to War, the political stance of PM’s founding editor, Ralph Ingersoll, was to oppose fascist governments in Europe as “a live threat to everything we believe in,” and to express support for Communist governments and parties: “We do not believe either the study of the works of Karl Marx or membership in the Communist Party in America is antisocial.”
Dr. Seuss’s cartoons often accompanied editorials published on PM’s front page during the key years just before and after the United States’ entry into World War II. Many of his cartoons ridiculed noninterventionists, discrediting them as racists and anti-Semites—particularly the American hero of aviation, Charles Lindbergh, who was the spokesman for the America First Committee. After Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, Dr. Seuss made more political cartoons attacking Lindbergh and the America First Committee than any other person or group.

הנה 4 שאלות לש”ס

אחד הקוראים המובהקים שלנו ביקש להציע לו שאלות עבור פגישת זום שאורגנה לקהילתו עם חבר כנסת משה ארבל מש”ס.

הנה מה ששלחתי לו (בנימה סרקסטית):

שומר מצוות ספרדי, עמירם בן אוליאל, נחטף לכלא מבודד ע”פ הודאות שהוצאו ע”י עינויי השב”כ בעלילת דומא. מדוע אינכם פועלים לפדות את אסירי ציון?

כיצד ש”ס, בראשותו של אריה דרעי, מתכננת לעקור ולבטל את הסכמי אוסלו הרצחניים, ומדוע התעכבה עד כה?

השלטון מבטל אותנו מקיום כשליש ממנין תרי”ג מצוות. מה תעשו על מנת לחדש מיידית את עבודת הקרבנות בהר הבית?

לסיום, כמפלגה שמיצגת את היהדות המסורתית, מה תעשה ש”ס לבטל את המשטר האוליגרכי, ולקדם את מלכות בית דוד?

לא נראה לי שהוא ישתמש בזה…

Corona Despair Expected to Lower Birth Rates in America, etc. BUT NOT ISRAEL!

Excerpt from CBS News:

When the pandemic first took hold in the U.S., many joked that widespread lockdowns would spark a “baby boom” and sky-high birth rates. But nearly a year later, the opposite appears to be true.

Provisional birth rate data provided to CBS News by 29 state health departments shows a roughly 7.3% decline in births in December 2020, nine months after COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. California, the most populous state, reported a 10.2% decline, falling to 32,910 births in December from 36,651 the year prior. In the same time frame, births declined by 30.4% in Hawaii.

While birth rates have been falling for nearly a decade, Phil Cohen, a sociologist at the University of Maryland, said December’s drop was the biggest he’s seen since the baby boom ended in 1964.

“The scale of this is really large,” Cohen said in a telephone interview with CBS News. “Regardless of whether you think it’s good or bad to have a lot of children, the fact that we’re suddenly having fewer means things are not going well for a lot of people.”

Provisional birth rate data provided to CBS News by 29 state health departments shows a roughly 7.3% decline in births in December 2020, nine months after COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. California, the most populous state, reported a 10.2% decline, falling to 32,910 births in December from 36,651 the year prior. In the same time frame, births declined by 30.4% in Hawaii.

And now for the Holy Land, from Jpost of Jan. 15:21, quoting Haaretz’s top researchers in its TheMarker, complete with leftist\Malthusian hand-wringing:

The subhead predicts that by 2065, “Israel is slated” to be the most crowded nation on earth, with the exception of Bangladesh. The author asks, “Can Israel continue to grow like Nigeria while maintaining a standard of living like Holland?”

Israel’s population is indeed growing 2% a year, four times the average of just 0.5% in other developed countries.

Let me ask, dear reader, is this the good news or the bad news?

In the aforementioned Holland, for instance, demographers are celebrating a 0.24% birthrate increased to 1.668 births per woman in 2019. The fertility rate for Nigeria in 2020 was 5.28 births per woman, a slight decrease. The literacy rate for Nigerian women is 52.7%.

Why is this relevant? Because, according to the World Bank, “a negative correlation is most clearly seen between different levels of female education and total fertility rate in a population.” In other words, the more schooling a woman has, the fewer children she is likely to bear.

This is true in most countries, but it’s not true overall in Israel, where women’s matriculation in higher education has grown in addition to our fertility, outstripping the number of men who go on to university. We – Jewish, Christian, Muslim women all together – have more years of formal education than the OECD average.

And according to the nonpartisan Taub Institute, “Israel’s fertility is not only exceptional because it is high. It is exceptional because strong pronatalist norms cut across all educational classes and levels of religiosity, and because fertility has been increasing alongside increasing age at first birth and education – at least in the Jewish population. From an international perspective, these are atypical patterns.”

Listen to this (Hyehudi has stressed this in the past):

And what’s driving this increase? Not the large haredi and Arab families, but so-called secular and traditional families. Middle-class families want a fourth child. Children of Russian immigrants who grew up with small families want more children.

ברוך משמח ציון בבניה!

Not surprisingly, the larger families in the religious Jewish and Muslim sectors do get special attention in the year’s end article as examples of what’s supposedly wrong with large families.

They have indeed been hot spots of the coronavirus, but so are the less affluent areas in most countries. You don’t see major newspapers in the United States suggesting that congested inner-city residents who have high rates of COVID-19 should have smaller families. Journalists would be accused of racism.

Read the rest here…