Yes, Yeshiva Kitchens Also Need a Mashgiach…

Published Fall 2013

Kashrus has come a long way. Kashrus agencies ensure the highest standards of kashrus in factories and food establishments worldwide, by maintaining a staff of experts in halacha, and in food technology, equipment and ingredients. Consumers have been trained to know which products are acceptable and how to maintain a kosher kitchen l’mehadrin. Kashrus in shuls is usually overseen by the rav of the kehila.

However, one area of kashrus that has received little attention – even throughout the past several decades of unprecedented kashrus growth – is kashrus in our schools. These “heiligeh mekomos”, where tens of thousands of our “tinokos shel bais rabban” spend much of their time during the course of their formative years, deserve the same attention as factories, eating establishments, shuls and our homes.

It is difficult to address the needs of each school as every situation is different. The issues at a yeshiva with a full-service kitchen, open seven days a week, are different than those of an elementary school that has no kitchen. The purpose of this article is to address specific issues that apply to an array of different schools. [Sections 1, 4, 5 and 6 below relate to all schools. Sections 2 and 3 below relate primarily to schools with kitchens or lunch programs.]

1. Kosher Policy – First and foremost, every school should create written kashrus guidelines, and a clear and consistent system should be put in place. Policies should be adopted which address these guidelines. They should be distributed to the entire staff and on some level, the parents and students as well. They must be periodically reviewed and updated. New staff should be taught these guidelines.

2. Someone in Charge – If there is an active school kitchen, someone should be placed in charge of the kashrus program in the school. That individual should be trained (as a mashgiach) by someone knowledgeable in kashrus (e.g., by the local vaad hakashrus). He or she should also be familiar with all school policies and ensure that those using the kitchen are in compliance. He should also keep up to date with the kashrus industry to know what is acceptable. For example, years ago canned vegetables were acceptable without kosher certification. However, due to changes in the canning industry that policy changed and kashrus agencies now recommend only canned vegetables with a hechsher. When a change takes place, the school representative should be notified (like any mashgiach for the local kashrus agency) so that he remains up to date. All school personnel should be aware that this person is the clearinghouse for all kashrus issues. The mashgiach should have the support of rabbanim and/or kashrus personnel to whom he can go with shaalos (e.g., “kitchen” mix-up or whether or not a hechsher is acceptable). A “rav hamachshir” should be appointed for final say on all policy (e.g., menahel, rav or rabbinic members of the vaad hachinuch, etc.)

3. Specific Issues to Address – Furthermore, schools that have an active school kitchen should be treated no differently than local restaurants that have approved kosher certification. It is critical to address almost all kashrus issues that arise at eating establishments. This is not only true in yeshiva kitchens that cook three meals a day, but also in schools where the kitchen is used periodically. The following is a checklist:

a. What is the system for segregating meat, pareve and dairy? Fish and meat? When relevant, are utensils clearly marked and properly stored (i.e., no dairy utensils or food are exposed when meat is being processed)?

b. Are bishul akum issues addressed? If the cook is an akum,who is turning on the flames? Who is present if the flame is extinguished?

c. If leafy vegetables (e.g., romaine lettuce) or fruit that may be infested (e.g., strawberries) are being served, who is ensuring that all tolaim issues have been addressed? Who is conducting b’dikas tolaim?

d. Is there a trained mashgiach on premises? Is the mashgiach present for enough time?Are the standards  of this “commercial kitchen” acceptable to the local vaad hakashrus?

e. Is there an overall system of oversight and accountability for all kitchen personnel?

f. Who has keys and/or access to the kitchen?

g. Who can bring in food? Can a non-shomer Shabbos teacher cook in the kitchen? Are all the Jewish teachers trained in the halachos of kashrus, and can they be relied upon?

h. Do parents and students who cook in the kitchen (e.g., Chanuka and graduation dinners, G.O. and student council events, Ladies Auxillary luncheons, etc.) know all of the policies? Is someone overseeing their activities?

i. Federal and state lunch programs in Jewish schools require kashrus protocols. If the food is produced on-site, the school kitchen should have proper kashrus standards as they are now a miniature catering hall. If food is delivered from a local kosher certified restaurant or caterer (i.e.,contracted out), it is critical that a proper system is set up once the food leaves the production facility (e.g., who makes the delivery, is it properly sealed, who oversees the food when it comes to the school, etc.). Every step of the system in place should be reviewed by a kashrus professional.

j. Is there a clear list of acceptable hechsherim? A list of kosher-approved beverages?

k. Who is monitoring incoming ingredients? Someone must check all incoming items to ensure the approved hechsher is on the label, and that all necessary seals are on the incoming products. Meat and poultry in particular need two seals. Fish (including fishsticks, a very popular food served in schools), grape juice and other potential issurei d’oraisa also need two seals. Other products, including cheese, pizza, bread, cake and milk must also come in properly sealed (one seal is enough  for these potential issurei d’rabonon). Seals often break in transport, and in such cases the certifying agency does not take responsibility. It is critical that all seals are intact. Furthermore, it is critical for someone to carefully check every label – even if multiple “identical products” come into the kitchen. It is common for a similar non-kosher product to “find its way” onto a kosher pallet or into a shopping bag. Just because one or two labels bear a proper hechsher does not mean they all do. Check every label.

l. When necessary, who is toveling the keilim? Do they know the halachos?

m. If vessels become treif, who is kashering these keilim?

n. Have workers been given proper guidelines? What controls are in place? Who is authorized to use the microwave and toaster ovens? What controls are in place to ensure that no one heats meat in a dairy microwave or pareve toaster oven (and vice versa)? Does the cleaning crew or other workers have access to these ovens at night, when no one is around to see what they might heat?

o. Is hafrashas challah done properly and when necessary?

Continue reading…

From Star-K, here.

חזק ואמץ?! דברי ח”כ פינדרוס לחיים ולדר הרשע – לאחר חשיפת האמת

מתוך כתבה באתר כיפה:

ציטוט:

ההודעה נשלחה אחרי שהעיתונאי אהרון רבינוביץ’ שפוצץ את הפרשה שלח את התחקיר בקבוצה.

פנינו לפינדרוס בבקשה לקבל תגובה אך פינדרוס בחר שלא להגיב.

לא יבא עמוני ומואבי – כפיות טובה מצד לוט, או משום שנאת ישראל

נחמיה ר”פ י”ג:

ביום ההוא נקרא בספר משה באזני העם ונמצא כתוב בו אשר לא יבוא עמני ומאבי בקהל האלהים עד עולם. כי לא קדמו את בני ישראל בלחם ובמים וישכר עליו את בלעם לקללו ויהפך אלהינו הקללה לברכה.

מלבי”ם בחלק באור הענין:

כי לא קדמו, ר”ל שאם היו יראים מפניכם באמת (וי”ל אמתלא על ששכרו אח”כ את בלעם) הי”ל לקדם אותם בלחם ובמים ולבקש מהם שלום וברית, ואם לא קדמו בלחם כי לא היו יראים מפניהם למה שכרו את בלעם, ולא תאמר שהלא לא הועילה קללת בלעם ומה בכך, עז”א ויהפך אלהינו את הקללה, ולולא זאת היתה קללתו מזקת.

‘Mishpat Ivri’ – The Navos Trial

Melachim I 21:

ויהי אחר הדברים האלה כרם היה לנבות היזרעאלי אשר ביזרעאל אצל היכל אחאב מלך שמרון… ויאמר נבות אל אחאב חלילה לי מיהוה מתתי את נחלת אבתי לך… ותאמר אליו איזבל אשתו אתה עתה תעשה מלוכה על ישראל קום אכל לחם ויטב לבך אני אתן לך את כרם נבות היזרעאלי. ותכתב בספרים לאמר קראו צום והשיבו את נבות בראש העם. והושיבו שנים אנשים בני בליעל נגדו ויעדהו לאמר ברכת אלהים ומלך והוציאהו וסקלהו וימת.

ויעשו אנשי עירו הזקנים והחרים אשר הישבים בעירו כאשר שלחה אליהם איזבל כאשר כתוב בספרים אשר שלחה אליהם. קראו צום והשיבו את נבות בראש העם. ויבאו שני האנשים בני בליעל וישבו נגדו ויעדהו אנשי הבליעל את נבות נגד העם לאמר ברך נבות אלהים ומלך ויצאהו מחוץ לעיר ויסקלהו באבנים וימת. וישלחו אל איזבל לאמר סקל נבות וימת…

Claude Translation:

After these events, Naboth the Jezreelite had a vineyard in Jezreel, adjacent to the palace of Ahab, king of Samaria… Naboth said to Ahab, “God forbid that I should give you the inheritance of my fathers.” Ahab’s wife Jezebel said to him, “Do you now govern the kingdom of Israel? Rise, eat, and be of good cheer — I will give you the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite.” She wrote letters and sent them to the elders and nobles of Naboth’s city, ordering: “Proclaim a fast and seat Naboth at the head of the people. Place two lawless men opposite him and have them testify against him, saying, ‘You have blasphemed God and the king.’ Then take him out and stone him to death.”

The elders and nobles of his city did exactly as Jezebel had instructed in the letters she sent them. They proclaimed a fast and seated Naboth at the head of the people. The two lawless men came and sat opposite him and testified against Naboth before the people, saying, “Naboth has blasphemed God and the king.” They led him outside the city and stoned him to death. They then sent word to Jezebel: “Naboth has been stoned and is dead.”

Malbim on passuk 7 explains Izevel’s thinking about Hard/Soft Power:

השאלות: מה כוונתה במ”ש אתה עתה תעשה מלוכה.
אתה עתה, אמרה בעת שמיסדים בית מלכות במדינה שעדיין לא היה להם מלך, אזי קובעים ביניהם משפט המלוכה וחוקיה, ומפרטים מה יוכל המלך ומה לא יוכל לעשות, לא כן במלכות ישנה מי סכל להשקיף על משפט המלוכה, המלך עושה כל אשר בכחו לעשות באין מוחה, וז”ש וכי אתה עתה תעשה מלוכה – ר”ל וכי אתה – העושה המלוכה הלא היא קיימת מכמה דורות, או הכי עתה – תעשה, רק שלא ידעת איך תקחהו מידו בחזקה פן ימרדו העם בראותם כי תגזול נחלת אחרים ואני אתן לך – ע”י ערמה.

Note well: They didn’t accuse Navos of Ba’al blasphemy in a “Baalist” court on a heathen celebration, and use impalement. No. They convened a Jewish “beis din” sitting in the chair of Moshe Rabbenu, on a Jewish fast, accused Navos of a Torah violation (as if they cared) alongside rebellion against the king, via Torah-ordained witnesses, and gave him the Torah-ordained punishment for aveiros against the Torah. And all this, by faithless judges acting in bad faith, for the sake of achieving a personal victory for the personalist, anti-Torah kingdom.

Ironically, the accused actually said “חלילה לי מיהוה”, see Malbim there, who explains that Navos feared the garden itself being used for Achav’s Avoda Zara.

As the “Anglo-Israelite” regime, continuing the British oppressor’s legal code (and selling us out to the enemy), steadily loses legitimacy, the additive of “Mishpat Ivri” (whose weasel-name “ivri” itself connotes the absurdity) is not a step in the right direction, but a step in the wrong one. “Mishpat Ivri” syncretism is not just incoherent and hypocritical, it’s a cynical inversion, employing the Torah’s details and authority against the entire Torah itself and only prolongs the annihilation of the pagan injustice system.

Mishpat Ivri is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Why are those who study and care about Torah law (utterly distinct from their own “judges”, Jewish in name only) handing Izevel yemach shema vezichra a foreign, but internally faux-legitimate form, to mimic and mock Torah law?!