How Walter Block Would Make Peace with North Korea

Dealing With North Korea

If I were President of the United States, or, more realistically, if Ron or Rand Paul were, and they appointed me Secretary of Defense, or Secretary of State, this is how I would deal with Kim Jong-un and the North Korean situation.

First, realize that Un’s theatrics are, from his own point of view, perfectly rational. He is not stupid. He looks at what happened to Muammar Gaddafi of Libya; murdered by mobs after kow-towing to the Great Satan. He notes the demise of Saddam Hussain of Iraq, another country that got on the wrong side of our imperialist nation; a similar dismal end befell him, too. It does not take much brain power to realize that Un’s only hope of escaping a similar fate would be, roughly, the one he has adopted: belligerence, nuclear armament, bellicosity, etc.

Here is what to do about the situation.

  1. Withdraw some 35,000 U.S. troops from the demilitarized zone, separating North and South Korea. What in bloody blue blazes are they doing there in the first place? Is not the Korean War of 1951 yet drawing to a close?
  2. Sign a formal agreement, a treaty, a contract, with, yes, North Korea, ending the unconstitutional, undeclared “police action” of 1951. This never should have been started in the first place. It is time, it is past time, to end it.
  3. Stop opposing any and all attempts of the two Koreas to unify with one another, perhaps along similar lines established by East and West Germany. What business is it of the U.S. what happens in that far away land? Ordinarily, I favor as many countries as possible. Seven billion plus is my ultimate goal, one for each of us. Certainly I support the secession of Catalonia, Quebec and any other breakaway province (or state! California: best of luck to you people in this regard). But, I am willing to make an exception in this one instance. In any case, this should be up, entirely, to Koreans, and the U.S. should take its big fat thumb out of this process.
  4. Open up a U.S. Embassy in Pyongyang. If we want peace with the Hermit Kingdom, this is a necessary step. As it happens, I oppose all such institutions. Maybe, perhaps, just possibly, they had some sort of legitimate function in a bygone day. But nowadays, in an era of electronic communications, they are not needed. We should not only pull all U.S. troops back to our own soil, but do this for diplomats as well. With one exception: North Korea. Yes, a U.S. embassy there would be an act of good faith. After relations between the two countries have normalized, then and only then would it be a proper moment to shut that one down too.
  5. Appoint Dennis Rodman U.S. Ambassador to North Korea. This sounds silly, but I am deadly serious about it. Yes, yes, get some career diplomats to assist him in dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s. But, it is difficult to think of a more friendly gesture than that.
  6. Well, here is another one. Maybe it is not all that problematic to think of something along these kindly lines. Stop those “War Games” between the U.S. and South Korea, which take place all over the neighborhood, east and west of North Korea, north and south of it, over and possibly under it too. How would we like it if a foreign power played “War Games” in our locality? We would not be too fond of it, I imagine. The U.S. established a “Monroe Doctrine” to keep foreign powers away from our doorstep. Does any rational person doubt that other countries, too, would like to establish a cordon sanitaire around themselves as well?
  7. Announce a unilateral declaration of free trade between the U.S. and North Korea. According to that old aphorism, if goods do not cross national borders, armies will. Does not the U.S. now have enough ongoing undeclared wars all over the place? Hot ones in the Middle East and Afghanistan, Cold ones with Russia, China, Iran, etc. Do we really need this potentially nuclear conflagration with North Korea as well?
  8. And while we’re at it, stop with this craziness with China. Yes, we have a balance of trade deficit with the Middle Kingdom. I’ve got a horrid record with Wal-Mart and McDonald’s. They don’t buy a penny of my services, ever, and I purchase goods from them all the time. What of it? Insofar as unilateral declarations of free trade is concerned, yes, North Korea first, and then, five minutes later, with every other nation on the planet.

Why is it so important that we sort out this outrageous situation with North Korea? Why is this perhaps more imperative than regularized relations with other parts of the world into which the U.S. has stuck its ugly proboscis? Kim Jong-un is less stable than the leaders of other countries we have invaded, or threatened. He has nuclear capabilities, and a fast developing delivery system. A mistake would annihilate the people of that poor country, and, perhaps, horribly, those of an American city. This is not the time, if ever there was, for threats, bombast, belligerence, which has been hurled in both directions. This is the time for the adults to take charge. No, it is long past that time.

Dennis, are you down with this?

From Lewrockwell.com, here.

All Chazal’s Words for Taxes

They have many.

Breishis Rabbah 1:14:

א”ר אבדימוס, אם נתת מכיסך צדקה הקב”ה הוא משמרך מן הפיסין ומן הזמיונות מן הגולגלאות ומן הארנונות.

We need a translation for each and every term.

Google’s Political Censorship Edges Closer to the Breaking Point

Google Hiring 10,000 Certified Morons to Further Throttle Free Speech

Ok everybody, grit your teeth, this is going to be very, very painful.

Google is escalating its campaign of internet censorship, announcing that it will expand its workforce of human censors to over 10,000, the internet giant announced on December 4. The censors’ primary focus will be videos and other content on YouTube, its video-sharing platform, but will work across Google to censor content and train its automated systems, which remove videos at a rate four times faster than its human employees.

Human censors have already reviewed over 2 million videos since June. YouTube has already removed over 150,000 videos, 50 percent of which were removed within two hours of upload. The company is working to accelerate the rate of takedown through machine-learning from manual censorship, according to YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki in an official blog post.

The hiring drive by Google is yet another advance in the campaign against any expression of political opposition. Other social media giants have implemented measures against “fake news”; Facebook has altered its algorithms to reduce the visibility of certain news stories, and Twitter has banned the Russian-funded media outlets RT and Sputnik from advertising on the platform.

While railing against “extremist content,” “child exploitation” and “hoaxes” in the interest of “public safety,” the ultimate goal of this campaign is the suppression of left-wing, anti-war sentiment.

Any censorship on YouTube will undoubtedly have an immense impact on online political discourse. According to a white paper by technology conglomerate Cisco, video will account for 69 percent of all consumer-based internet traffic in 2017; this is expected to rise to 80 percent by 2019.

YouTube essentially operates a monopoly on prerecorded video sharing and general video monetization, with some 1.5 billion viewers who watch 1 billion hours of video each day on the platform; in 2015, Google policy manager Verity Harding informed the European Parliament, which was then pressuring YouTube to censor “terror-related” content, that 300 hours of video were being uploaded to the platform every minute.

YouTube began removing photographic and video documentation of war crimes in Syria in August, terminating some 180 accounts and removing countless videos from other channels, including footage uploaded by Airwars of coalition air raids that have killed civilians, according to Hadi al-Khatib, the founder of Syrian Archive. YouTube later stated that it would work to “quickly reinstate” any videos and channels that it “removed mistakenly.”

In November, YouTube removed over 51,000 videos concerning Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni-American imam who was assassinated via missile raid by the Obama administration on September 30, 2011. Awlaki was never charged with, let alone convicted of any crime. The mass removal was praised by the New York Times, one of the largest mouthpieces of the American ruling elite, as a “watershed moment.”

Continue reading…

From Lewrockwell.com, here.