The ‘Kedushas Tziyon‘ foundation distribute their monthly pamphlet all over Charedi neighborhoods in Israel. Thank God, they receive no government aid.
Now they seek to publish an English-language version in the US. This costs money.
To contribute in any way, email yyy7@bezeqint.net or leave a message at 052-7195368
האם סכין שחיטה חייב בטבילה ● ברזלים שמתקנים המצות ● כלים שאין מבשלים בהם ואין מביאים לשולחן ● לקחו סכין לחתוך קלפים והשני שאל ממנו לאכילה ● כלים שקנה למכור לשימוש אכילה, והשני שאל ממנו ● קייטרינג ● הראשון קנה לחתוך קלפים והשני קנה לחתוך בשר ● כלים חד פעמים אצל ישראל הראשון ונמלך להשתמש הרבה פעמים ● כלי בשותפות ישראל וגוי וכן אם קנה אח”כ הישראל ● סיכום
November 11, 2016
Stunned political analysts are missing the most plausible argument explaining Donald Trump’s unexpected victory. The misreading of the American electorate stems from the political class’ acceptance of mistaken (and increasingly insane) economic dogma that has arisen over the past generation. Based on their flawed understanding of economics, the pundits could simply not understand why the electorate had become totally disillusioned.
According to the ideas favored by economists on Wall Street, in government, and in the Federal Reserve, Americans should be enjoying a marginally good economy. Unemployment is low, home values and the stock markets are high, credit is cheap and plentiful, prices are stable, auto sales are robust, healthcare is available to all, and GDP is growing, albeit at levels that are below optimal. These are conditions that would normally favor the incumbent party and would discourage voters from taking a chance on an unknown who has promised to tear down the entire system. But that is precisely what happened. There can only be two explanations: Either Trump supporters were motivated by hatred strong enough to cause them to vote against their own economic interests, or they understood the economic reality better than the Ph.D.’s. I believe the people got it right.
From Lewrockwell.com, here.
I feel uneasy at the election results. The elites worked so hard to defeat Trump; will they back down so fast because the voters voted?
Not that Trump is so much less harmful than Clinton in my own opinion. Read this realist extract from Ron Paul, for instance:
…
Republican candidate Donald Trump misses the point. He promises to bring back jobs to America without any understanding of the policies that led to their departure in the first place. Yes, he is correct that the middle class is in worse shape than when Obama took office, but not once did he mention how it happened: the destructive policies of the Federal Reserve. The financing of our warfare/welfare state through the printing of phony money. Distorted interest rates that encourage consumption and discourage saving and investment.
Trump tweeted this week that home ownership is at its lowest rate in 51 years. He promised that if elected he will bring back “the American dream.” He seems to have no idea that home ownership is so low because the Fed-created housing bubble exploded in 2007-2008, forcing millions of Americans who did not have the means to actually purchase a home to lose their homes. Not a word about the Fed from Trump.
But he was too oppositional for their tastes. The elites thought he was dangerous for their interests. So that’s it?!
There is now a court case against Brexit. In Bet Shemesh, new elections were called. Trump didn’t buy assassination insurance (choosing an even more displeasing VP).