re: Forget the Problem of Religious Language and Wonder About ‘Political Language’

A critic charges Hyehudi Editor with making properly scientific assertions lacking any scientific grounding.

First, who says the article was in all earnestness? I note a humorous tone throughout.

Second, I don’t know of anyone who dared investigate whether or not politician equals psychopath, etc. (Either they don’t want to find out, or they did and the results were spiked.)