Sanhedrin 97a – 97b – “What Came, Came”

The 2,000 Year-Old Klipah of Moshiach

June 22, 2017

By Devorah Fastag

Chazal tell us that this world exists for 6,000 years. The first 2,000 years are called “tohu” – emptiness, because the Torah had not yet been given.

The next 2,000 years are called the period of Torah. This begins with the period of the Avos (Avraham was born in 1948 from creation) and includes Matan Torah which took place in 2448, and the period of the mishkan and both Batei Mikdash.

The next 2,000 years are called the period of Moshiach. Since Moshiach did not come in that period, how can this be so?

Chazal were telling us about a plan Hashem had for his world. Had we been worthy, Moshiach would have come at the end of the second Temple period, or shortly afterwards, and would have lasted for 2,000 years. The beginning would have been the era of Moshiach ben Yosef, which could have lasted a long time, until the coming of the full redemption, with Moshiach ben David, who would have begun a miraculous era, with techias hameisim, and the return of the world to the level of Gan Eden before the sin of Etz HaDa’as. That is why Chazal say, “There is no difference between the days of Moshiach and this world except for being subject to foreign powers”. They were referring to the earlier stage, the period of Moshiach ben Yosef, before the miraculous stage of Moshiach ben David.

However, we did not merit this. There is a rule that when a potential comes into this world and is not used it does not simply disappear or lie dormant. Something even worse happens; the potential is taken over by the forces of evil. And so the potential power of Moshiach that existed in this period was taken over by tum’a.  Instead of the world getting the period of Moshiach ben Yosef, this became instead the period of a false Moshiach – Yeshua haNotsri.

For the Jews, this was a terrible disaster. The imposter taught many false things, saying that one no longer needed to keep most of the practical mitzvos, and claiming that Hashem had rejected the Jews and chosen him to lead the goyim who were now the “new Israel”. He claimed this because the goyim accepted him and the Jews didn’t. And although he was terrible for the Jews, the Rambam says, he did actually help the goyim rise to a higher level, because through him the goyim stopped worshipping their many pagan idols and learned many of the concepts of Judaism. But again, for the Jews he was a disaster, as we know from history.

Continue reading

From Questions in Hashkafa, here.

With Such Answers Who Needs Questions?!

Where is the logic behind saying two blessings on Tefillin, and then “Baruch Shem”?

When every Rema is zealously defended, we end up with the Aruch Hashulchan — like that on Orach Chaim 25:10 – 13.

I can’t copy it all. Here is an excerpt:

אינו מובן כלל, דממה נפשך: אם הדבר מרופה בידינו, דלכן יאמר “ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד”, למה לנו לברך שתים? נברך אחת כדין כל ספק ברכות. ואם הדין ברור בידינו, אם כן למה לנו לומר “ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד”? ובאמת הלבוש השמיט זה. (וגם הב”ח פקפק בזה, והמעדני יום טוב כתב שהוא לרווחא דמילתא. וצריך עיון.)

ולעניות דעתי נראה דאמירת “ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד” אינו מטעם ספק ברכה אלא מטעם אחר. ואף שהפוסקים כתבו שהוא מטעם זה, מכל מקום המנהג נראה לי מטעם אחר: דהנה כבר דקדקנו דאיך אפשר לברך שתי ברכות על דבר אחד?

ולכן נראה לי דברכת “על מצות תפילין” היא ברכת הודאה כמו שכתבתי מקודם, בהיות מצוה זו הקשר הגדול שמקשר את ישראל לאביהם שבשמים. לזה אנו מברכים ברכת הודאה, להודות להשם יתברך על הטוב הזה. ובהיות שעיקר הקשר הוא בפסוק “שמע ישראל”, ולכן אנו אומרים “ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעולם ועד” כמו שיעקב אבינו ענה כן בעת שהשבטים אמרו “שמע ישראל”, כדאיתא בפסחים (נו א).

וראיה לזה מלשון “תפילין” עצמה, שכתב הטור לשון “פלילה”, שהן אות ועדות לכל רואינו שהשכינה שורה עלינו… עד כאן לשונו. וזהו פירושו: דעל מצות תפילין, כלומר על מה שהשם יתברך התחבר אלינו – אנו נותנים לו יתברך שבח והודיה על זה.

One Form of Silly Chumra

Several Achronim have bent over backwards to justify the “custom” of redoing Kiddushin at a “Chupas Niddah”.

First of all, the Rambam doesn’t speak of Kiddishin but Nissuin. Second, and more important, is the Gemara in Gittin 5b:

בר הדיא בעי לאתויי גיטא אתא לקמיה דרבי אחי דהוה ממונה אגיטי אמר ליה צריך אתה לעמוד על כל אות ואות אתא לקמיה דרבי אמי ורבי אסי אמרי ליה לא צריכת וכי תימא אעביד לחומרא נמצא אתה מוציא לעז על גיטין הראשונים

I’ll bet the evil “Minhag Yisra’el Torah” series part five (?) justifies this.

Rafi Farber: Why I’m Running for Zehut Primaries

Gambling as the canary, Why I’m running for Israel’s parliament

I’m running for a seat in Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, and any Jewish person in the world can vote for me, Israeli citizen or not. Seriously. Before I explain exactly how, here’s why I’m running.

Gambling as the canary, Why I’m running for Israel’s parliamentArguably the most famous Holocaust poem ever written was penned by a Lutheran Pastor. His name was Martin Niemöller. You’ve probably heard his poem before. It starts like this:

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist.”

It continues with trade unionists, then Jews, “Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.” It’s one of those things they make you memorize as a kid, especially a Jewish kid in Jewish day school.

I’m not a gambler, at least not the casino or games of chance or poker type. But I know the poem, and I’m aware enough to know that they come for the gamblers first. They – the ruling class who make their living taxing our work, telling us how to live our lives, how much we have to pay them, who we have to bomb and who we have to hate, who can work in what industry for how much, printing money and devaluing our paychecks when they run out of cash.

They clothe their rationalizations in moralizing terms to make you think they care about you. Gambling is dangerous, they say. It has to be regulated and taxed, they say. So that it is not abused. And by the way, the regulatory fees and taxes all go to them and their budgets, which are never balanced anyway. The ones who get the exclusive licenses to do business without being arrested always have a man on the inside, donating to campaigns, lobbying, buying influence.

First they come for the gamblers, because they’re the easiest to rob, without much backlash. People like Chris Christie, who last year strong-armed Atlantic City casinos by threatening to close them down, taxed them an extra $120 million in order to bail out his bankrupt city government buddies. They spent too much again. Oops. Let’s take more money from the casinos first then. And now, the moralizer is caught sun bathing with his family at a government-owned beach he closed to the public because his buddies in Trenton spent too much again. Oops.

“Did you get any sun today?” he was asked.

“I didn’t. I didn’t get any sun today,” he said.

And then the photos. Oops. And then we’re told he wasn’t lying because, “He had a baseball hat on.” Then he went back to his taxpayer funded beach house to take a shower. His water bill is paid by taxpayers, too. But trust him. Gambling is immoral.

Continue reading

From Calvin Ayre, here.