Argument From the Arguer Himself

I just read a doom and gloom article here.

It was coauthored by two people, one of whom’s views are no surprise, but the other is\was as mainstream as possible.

Here’s his bio:

“Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.”

No, I haven’t studied this under lab conditions, so I may be under a confirmation bias due to what I usually read. But I sense an accelerating clip of normies going sideways.

Perhaps the very change in such people is a cogent argument for paying them more attention. This doesn’t mean accepting specific claims suddenly far more popular, but reconsidering the opposing view, namely:

  • Everything is fine.
  • Upbeat economic and cultural forecasts can be trusted.
  • No one’s colluding or conspiring.
  • The sciences are doing great.
  • No major conflicts of interest.
  • You can mostly trust the news.
  • The various elites and authorities are basically good and goodwilled.
  • And so on.

Maybe not!