Kabbalah Creep – The Case of Selichos

Selihoth Before Midnight

September 2, 2018
Yes. Simply put, selihoth are, by definition not governed by the rest of the halachoth that govern other prayer services because they were not legislated by our sages. In the medieval period, it was assumed that selihoth were said at the last part of the night, in the period before dawn that would be too early for the morning services, such that selihoth would lead in to shaharith, which was timed so that the amida, the silent devotion, would begin at sunrise. The Rishonim and decisors, including the Rif, the Rosh, the Tur, Maimonides, and the Beth Yosef and the Rema were familiar with this meritorious but always voluntary practice, and they also never believed that selhihoth had to be recited during a particular time, nor did they ever believe or write that there was a time of day when selihoth should not be recited.

Later, and on the influence of the Zohar, it was believed that the ideal time for selihoth (and other prayers, by the way) was the second half of the night. It was also believed that the first half of the night was for some reason not the best time for supplication. This practice was mentioned by the Magen Avraham, but it must be reiterated that it was foreign to those who lived before him and also not codified as law, for the above stated reason: it was a preference best on post-talmudic consideration. I am therefore at a a loss to understand the later halachic literature, foremost the position of Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef, who made the assertion that there was, therefore, some sort of problem, and possibly prohibition, or even danger, in reciting selihoth before midnight just because it was not the best time according to a mystical understanding. I am also not capable of explaining why, in a similar responsum, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, who assumes the same halachic background as presented here, does not make the logical conclusion and state that there is absolutely no halachic problem with reciting the selihoth before midnight, instead giving a temporary emergency dispensation. I am therefore disappointed that in all of the subsequent literature that I have found, making the illogical jump from “not preferred” to “not allowed” seems to be the rule.

Be that as it may, many Jews are familiar with the practice of reciting selihoth before midnight. In their favor, I would like to point out that up until the modern era, no one had the necessary technology to know when exactly midnight was, and whenever you find reference to it in the literature, it means roughly midnight. When you have a night that is some eleven hours long, the sages would have considered three to eight hours after sunset to be “midnight.”

Also, in defense of  numerous congregations in Israel and the Diaspora, the neo-kabbalistic requirement that selihoth be said after midnight has, as a matter of fact, not been accepted as halacha, and the clear proof of this is the fact that they all host selihoth services that are well after dawn, and most often, after sunrise. According to the Kabbala, the time of divine favor is specifically the second half of the night, and the early morning, when it is already light out, is no longer that time. If a congregation is fine with having selihoth start ten minutes after sunrise, or hours thereafter, why should it mind having them 2 hours before exact midnight?

This issue is a good illustration of:

1. The inexplicable tendency of later rabbis to conflate “not done” with “prohibited,”and

2. Zealotry for preferred halachic positions. The early espousers of the preference for reciting selihoth before midnight specifically did not claim that other times were not fit for selihoth or that selihoth should not be recited at other times; it is only among the later generations that we find an insistence that the position must be followed.

Reprinted with permission from Avraham Ben Yehudahere.

Why Do Rabbis Endorse Arbitrary, Dangerous Speed Limits?!

What Speed Limits Aren’t . . . But Should Be

The main problem with speed limits is they’re not.

In a legal sense – yes. You are not legally allowed to drive faster than whatever the number on the sign is. But as a speed limit, the concept is idiotic.

Airplanes have speed limits. If you operate beyond the limits of the airframe, the plane will begin to physically disintegrate, stall or some other catastrophic thing.

These are speed limits which must be obeyed for actual safety – as opposed to keeping oneself safe from the predations of armed government workers (who will themselves “speed” in order to catch you in order to ticket you – proving that “speeding” isn’t unsafe, merely illegal… well, for us).

Because speed limits are mere legalisms, understood by all to be such – almost everyone drives at least as fast as the speed limit – luminous evidence that it is not a limit in the physical/mechanical or “safety” sense.

They are merely rules – which almost everyone ignores.

People get angry when they fall in behind a driver who is only going the speed limit. Almost everyone drives a little bit faster than whatever the posted limit is – as much as they think they can “get away” with.

As a practical matter, speed limits are the minimum speeds of travel on most roads.

This, of course, renders the term a species of illiteracy – unsurprising given the source. The same source that characterizes as “customers” people who are forced to hand over money for services they neither asked for nor use.

It is also – ironically – unsafe. As in actually dangerous. Because a “speed limit” which conveys no information to the driver about speeds beyond which it is probably not safe to drive leaves him with no way to gauge the speed beyond which it is probably not safe to drive – or which at least gives him some frame of reference.

This is easily demonstrated.

Most highways on the East Coast of the U.S. have posted speed limits of 65-70 MPH. If you drive that slowly, you risk being run over by a tractor trailer and will have other cars running up your tailpipe. So you kick it up to 75 or so – which is illegal “speeding” but is actually the safe speed you need to drive to avoid being run over by traffic.

But how much faster than 75 or so is the safe limit? How would you know?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer, of course. Variables include the skill of the driver as well as the capabilities of the car. But paying attention to whatever the sign says is as value-less as heeding the warning label on mattresses about it being a high crime to tear it off.

Read the Whole Article

From Eric Peters Autos, here.

מבקשים מהשלטון על התורה רק בעקיפין

הנה ציטוט מדרשת הגאון הרב מאיר מאזוז שליט”א, ממוצאי שבת פרשת כי תצא, גליון 127 הערה מס’ 19:

הנה בפרשה שלנו שקראנו היום יש פסוק ששווה מליונים: “כי יקח איש אשה חדשה לא יצא בצבא ולא יעבור עליו לכל דבר, נקי יהיה לביתו שנה אחת ושמח את אשתו אשר לקח” (דברים כ”ד ה”). וכי יש חק יותר אנושי והומני מזה?! הרי אדם שהתחתן והולך לצבא מיד אחרי שבעת ימי המשתה, אם ח”ו יפול במלחמה, אשתו צריכה לחכות ליבום לאח השני, ואם האח קטן היא צריכה לחכות לו עד שיגדל או עד שיביא שתי שערות, ולפעמים צריכה לחכות ארבע עשרה או חמש עשרה שנה עד שיעשה לה יבום או חליצה, ורוב העולם עושים חליצה (עיין בעלון הקודם הערה 2), אז לא חבל על הזמן?! לכן נותנים לו שנה אחת שישמח עם אשתו, ויוולד להם ילד או שלפחות תהיה האשה בהריון, וממילא ניצולה מהיבום. זה חק שאם היה כתוב בחוקי העותומאנים והאנגלים וכל האומות שבעולם, היו אומרים “איזה חכמים אלה!” אבל כיון שהוא כתוב בתורה לא מקבלים את זה. היה חבר כנסת אחד שהצעתי לו להכניס את החק הזה לכנסת, ואמר לי: הם לא רוצים לשמוע את זה, “על מי אדברה ואעידה וישמעו, הנה ערלה אזנם ולא יוכלו הקשב, הנה דבר ה’ היה להם לחרפה ולא יחפצו בו” (ירמיה ו’ י’). אתה לא יכול לדבר איתם, רק בעקיפין.

ע”כ.

כמו הגמרא מעילה י”ז א’:

שפעם אחת גזרה המלכות גזרה שלא ישמרו את השבת ושלא ימולו את בניהם ושיבעלו את נדות הלך רבי ראובן בן איסטרובלי וסיפר קומי והלך וישב עמהם אמר להם מי שיש לו אויב יעני או יעשיר אמרו לו יעני אמר להם אם כן לא יעשו מלאכה בשבת כדי שיענו אמרו טבית אמר ליבטל ובטלוה חזר ואמר להם מי שיש לו אויב יכחיש או יבריא אמרו לו יכחיש אמר להם אם כן ימולו בניהם לשמונה ימים ויכחישו אמרו טבית אמר ובטלוה חזר ואמר להם מי שיש לו אויב ירבה או יתמעט אמרו לו יתמעט אם כן לא יבעלו נדות אמרו טבית אמר ובטלוה הכירו בו שהוא יהודי החזירום.