Of Two Official Memorial Days

A meme still goes around:

“We have two memorial days; one to remind us of the cost of having a state, and the other to remind us of the cost of not having a state.”

This is misguided on every level.

  1. Having a state is not a home economics decision of cost/benefit analysis, but a Torah question.
  2. How can anyone who knows the history think, never mind be certain, a state would have prevented the latest Churban?
  3. Not to mention the actual jokers involved…
  4. Private, decentralized self-defense would be cheaper in both blood and money, as explained earlier.
  5. Who’s “We”?!
  6. Hre’s an alternative connection between the two days.

Here’s Rafi Farber…

Etzel: We Need to Rob the Jewish People in Order to Save Them…

Libertarians regard for-profit private defense associations funded via insurance as possible in the real world, as lawful, and as generally desirable. Learn more here and over here.

So, what about not-for-profit organizations? Maybe not. Here is an indicative, concrete counter-case: Etzel: Irgun Tzva’i Leumi.

Yes, Etzel was legitimate. As Rafi Farber, Alan Futerman and Walter Block write in the brilliant article titled “The Legal Status of the State of Israel – A Libertarian Approach“, p. 476:

These forces, Haganah, Etzel and Lehi were Jewish self-defense organizations which had the objective of protecting Jewish lives and property. Their goal was not to target or conquer civilian Arab lands, though conquering some areas was a defensive outcome of the War of Independence.

Also, they were private armies and/or police forces, which Rothbard and other libertarians favor.It is quite strange that he opposes voluntary, privately financed defense organizations when he continuously defended the very opposite point of view. Here he had a real life example, and it worked. These organizations actually defended Jews from attacks…

But “God is in the detail”…

The coauthors footnote “The Revolt”, by Menachem Begin for the piece above. Well, here is what he reveals on p.353 of the 1977 Israeli edition when discussing the war for Jaffa:

“Throughout the day about one hundred vehicles had been mobilised in the only way available to the underground since the beginning of the revolt – by means of temporary confiscation. It was not a pleasant way. But the owners knew from the experience of others that we always did our best to return their vehicles after the operation or, in case of damage, to pay them compensation. They knew, above all, that their vehicles were taken for the purposes of an essential war and many of them handed over their trucks or cars with a cheerful willingness. We had no other way. An underground cannot, and dare not, always use the same vehicles. Wheels leave tracks. And where were we to get sufficient money to buy all the vehicles we needed?”

And again on p. 367, the author describes unusual “robberies” in Tel Aviv storerooms and shops:

“Thousands and thousands of sacks for the Jaffa front!”

Hashem doesn’t help unless we steal from those innocent Jews we are trying to save?! I doubt that.

Question: But what if the “client” doesn’t agree to pay? How can anyone make a revolution under such stringent rules?

Answer: Tough. Hyehudi.org generally opposes violent revolution.

Hamodia Are Hateful Hypocrites!

Reading Hamodia’s recent editorial (concluding in the mealy-mouthed, passive voice of “changes must be made”) one would never guess they and theirs were passionately behind the witch hunt from the start, with slanted news articles, and loud, lying editorials. And no, no “lessons have been learned” for next time:

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney. If you cannot afford one, one will be appointed to you by the court. With these rights in mind, are you still willing to talk with me about the charges against you?”

There is no equivalent of these words, better known as the Miranda warning, in Hebrew. It isn’t, of course, that the words have no Hebrew equivalent, but that they have no application. Suspects in Israel can be and are questioned without an attorney present, and can and do incriminate themselves, even if they are minors.

Worse, when the suspicions, even far-fetched, involve crimes with a nationalistic motive, i.e. terrorism, all bets are off. Investigators can, and do, use all kinds of techniques to extract a confession, including depriving the minor of sleep and playing psychological games that leave no marks of physical abuse but most definitely leave emotional scarring.

That was the situation three years ago in the case of the Duma killings and the situation last week in the case of several young people arrested for allegedly committing a host of crimes.

To be sure, the firebombing of a Palestinian home in Duma was a heinous crime, which resulted in the deaths of three family members, including an 18-month-old baby. As such, law enforcement agencies and the courts should spare no legitimate effort in bringing the perpetrators to justice. However, the security forces, in their haste to convict Jews and show the world that they are evenhanded in their efforts to combat terror, overlooked obvious signs that pointed in a different direction.

For instance, they ignored the fact that there were arson attacks in Duma before and after the event in question, never exploring the possibility that there was a connection between the three, that perhaps all stemmed from a vendetta among Arab families.

The justice now hearing the case has expressed incredulity at the security forces for their failure to investigate the other two arsons and consider a connection.

The courts threw out the ill-gotten confessions and ordered the minor released to house arrest over the objections of the prosecution, but the suspects are scarred for life, as are their parents. Sadder still, no lessons have been learned from that debacle.

That’s why we had last week’s arrests of several minors accompanied by screeching headlines of a “Jewish underground” being uncovered. The charges? Some are relatively mild — graffiti; some are very serious. If these boys had any connection to a rock-throwing that claimed the life of an Arab woman driver, they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

But once again the notion of due process is trampled. We have young people squirreled away for a week, out of sight of lawyers, family members or any responsible adult who could speak out on their behalf. And once again the Shin Bet took advantage of the opportunity to extract confessions. And once again, the court threw them out as inadmissible.

For the security forces, this undemocratic modus operandi is win-win. “The Shin Bet conducts investigations using a successful method,” says attorney Adi Kedar of the Honenu organization, who represented some of the minors in the current case and the minor in the Duma case. “They arrest minors, put them in the cellars of the Shin Bet, and cut them off from the world. It succeeded? Excellent. It didn’t succeed? Bring in the next group of minors, maybe it’ll succeed. Who will end the injustice?”

And while Human Rights Watch and other so-called human rights organizations have never demanded an end to the torture of Jewish minors in Shin Bet custody, it isn’t because the minors haven’t been subjected to torture. “This child is handcuffed to a chair from morning to night, kept in disgraceful conditions, sleeping on the floor — if that isn’t torture I don’t know what is,” adds Kedar.

And there is the emotional torture. The isolated child who is told that his cellmate is an Arab terrorist with a knife with whom he’ll be left alone all night. The interrogations that are unnecessarily performed on Shabbos. And the trauma to parents who have no way of getting assurance that their child’s basic needs are being met.

The boys arrested last week proclaim their innocence, as do the suspects in the Duma case. We hope and pray that they will be found not guilty of all the charges.

In the meantime, questions need to be asked with regard to proper supervision of teenagers to ensure that their fiery idealism doesn’t lead to violence, and concerning the moral and legal limits of how far the Shin Bet can go in its attempts to extract confessions.

In short, there must be better oversight of the youths and better oversight of their interrogators.

The truth is, these problems were noted by outsiders (like the man they try not to even mention, Moshe Feiglin!) from the start, but Hamodia’s fake news factory ignored it all. In fact, the only reason they’re even writing about it now is to avoid being seen in their true light as one-sided, slavish quislings of the accursed regime.

Promiscuity Weakens the Israeli Army. So What?

Some religious Jews campaign against promiscuity in the IDF with the claim it weakens the IDF’s capabilities.

But Jews are the main target of the IDF, including physically!

(I mean not just the IDF proper, but the ‘Defense’ Ministry, etc.)

Gemara Me’illah 17a:

שפעם אחת גזרה המלכות גזרה שלא ישמרו את השבת ושלא ימולו את בניהם ושיבעלו את נדות הלך רבי ראובן בן איסטרובלי וסיפר קומי והלך וישב עמהם אמר להם מי שיש לו אויב יעני או יעשיר אמרו לו יעני אמר להם אם כן לא יעשו מלאכה בשבת כדי שיענו אמרו טבית אמר ליבטל ובטלוה חזר ואמר להם מי שיש לו אויב יכחיש או יבריא אמרו לו יכחיש אמר להם אם כן ימולו בניהם לשמונה ימים ויכחישו אמרו טבית אמר ובטלוה חזר ואמר להם מי שיש לו אויב ירבה או יתמעט אמרו לו יתמעט אם כן לא יבעלו נדות אמרו טבית אמר ובטלוה הכירו בו שהוא יהודי החזירום

Wouldn’t you prefer your predator weaker?!

OK, so they’re Jews, too. I’m not promoting depravity. But I disagree with the pro-IDF rhetoric behind the anti-vice. And we should focus on replacing the IDF, instead.

(Someone said I should read “The Kinder, Gentler Military: How Political Correctness Affects Our Ability to Win Wars” by Stephanie Gutmann. I’ll consider considering it.)

For a longer explanation of the problem with the monopoly IDF, see this (Hebrew).