I already said this in Hebrew in the middle of another article, but now Feiglin is repeating his standard, naive rightist slogan, it’s time for me to repeat my view once more: No death penalty for terrorists!
Why? Because it will eventually be applied to Jews, as well (crazy as it sounds), or solely to Jews. It will start out as a rhetorical question (“what’s the difference, exactly?”), and eventually be considered obvious.
Don’t you know the regime terms property crimes, such as spray painting price tags on real estate (?) and puncturing tires “Jewish terror“?! Have you forgotten the state believes in saving terrorists’ lives?! The word “terror” lacks a good definition, anyway. Was “Oslo” or founding Chamas terror? If not, why not?
Besides, Feiglin’s very complaint about the immorality of not killing terrorists applies to holding a court case for them, too. Aren’t they enemy soldiers?