Hyehudi.org

Alternate Altar

In 1925 there was an interesting exchange of letters between R’ Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld (1848-1932), Chief Rabbi of Yerushalayim, and R’ Shimon Sofer[1] (1850–1944), the rav of Erlau, Hungary, about the possibility of reinstating the mizbayach (“altar”) on the Har Habayis (“Temple Mount”) in order to allow karbonos to be offered even in the absence of the Beis Hamikdash. R’ Shimon Sofer wrote: “Since Hashem has given us favor in the eyes of the rulers of Eretz Yisrael who allow us to conduct our matters entirely in accordance with the Torah, perhaps it is now the time to consider erecting the mizbayach on the Har Habayis and offer karbonos on it as was done at the beginning of the second Beis Hamikdash when karbonos were brought before the Beis Hamikdash had been rebuilt.[2] It is also stated in Yerushalmi that the Beis Hamikdash will initially be built with only the minimum of a mizbayach on which to offer karbonos…[3] If Yerushalayim rabbanim will jointly request permission from the British authorities in this matter, it will undoubtedly be granted. Money is not an issue because all Jews will gladly contribute… The actual halachos about the sacrifice procedures and kohanim can be discussed by the sages of Eretz Yisrael and decided by the majority…”

R’ Yosef Chaim responded in a letter: “I am afraid that you have been misinformed regarding the goodwill of the government towards allowing us to conduct our affairs in complete accordance with the Torah. I will relate a small incident that illustrates the true state of affairs. When the Jewish High Commissioner, Sir Herbert Samuel, came here several years ago, I sent him a letter requesting that we be allowed to post a sign on the road leading to the Har Habayis to warn Jews of the Torah’s prohibition against entering the Har Habayis in our present state of tumah (“ritual contamination”). Many are unaware of this law and as a result transgress an isur kares (violation punishable by spiritual excision). I explained the severity of the prohibition to the commissioner but he declined this request because such a sign would offend irreligious Jews. Besides, the Temple area has been in the possession of the Arabs for quite some time, and even false rumors alleging that Jews were attempting to seize control of the area from them have in the past provoked Arab hatred against us. If Jews would openly acknowledge such intentions, terrible consequences, G-d forbid, would result. Consequently, we must await Hashem’s salvation and daven that He send us Moshiach and we will rejoice in His salvation speedily and in our days…”[4]