תורת הגאון רא”מ הורוויץ מפינסק

ההגהות על הש”ס מאת הרא”מ הורוויץ מפינסק זצ”ל ו’ילקוט המפרשים החדש’ של מהדורת ‘עוז והדר’ / הרב יעקב טריביץ

תמונה ללא תיאורהורדת קובץ PDF

הרב יעקב טריביץ

ההגהות על הש”ס מאת הרא”מ הורוויץ מפינסק זצ”ל ו’ילקוט המפרשים החדש’ של מהדורת ‘עוז והדר’

נודע בשער בת רבים שמעו של הגאון האדיר מגאוני ליטא, האדם הגדול בענקים מוהר”ר אלעזר משה הורוויץ זללה”ה (תקע”ז-תר”ן), שהיה אב”ד פינסק משנת תר”ך. גאונותו המופלאה, וחריפותו ובקיאותו בכל מכמני התורה, עשו לו שֵם בכל קצוות עולם התורה[1]. חיבה יתירה נודעת לו מההערכה העצומה שרחש לו מרן דדורות בתראי בעל החזון איש זצוק”ל. על המימרא של הגר”ח מבריסק שמנה את שלושת גדולי דורו (אביו הבית הלוי, מהרי”ל דיסקין והגר”י סלנטר) והוסיף שאם רוצים אפשר להוסיף רביעי: הגאב”ד דפינסק הגרא”מ הורוויץ, נענה מרן החזו”א ואמר ‘אכן אנו רוצים’! (מעשה איש ח”ד עמ’ צא). ובאורחות רבינו (הגרי”י קנייבסקי): ‘מרן מאוד החזיק מרא”מ כאחד מיחידי גדולי הדור בתקופה ההיא’. חתנו, ר’ ברוך אפשטיין בעל ה’תורה תמימה’, בנו של הגאון רי”מ בעל ‘ערוך השולחן’, כתב הספד גדול אודותיו הנקרא ‘נחל דמעה’ ביום השלושים לפטירתו ו’ מנחם אב תר”ן, והוא בן ע”ג במותו[2]. וראה גם בערוך השולחן (אה”ע סי’ קכב ובסדר הגט) שהביא דבר הלכה ממחותנו הגרא”מ. היכרותו העיקרי של עולם התורה עם רבינו הגרא”מ איש פינסק היא דרך הגהותיו אשר נדפסו בחייו ע”י האלמנה והאחים ראם בש”ס וילנא משנת תר”מ עד תרמ”ב, על המסכתות בתחילת הש”ס, ובעיקר מסדר מועד (וכן על משניות זרעים), וגם הגהות אלו המה מקצת מחידושיו על סדר הש”ס. וכבר הצֵרו על כך מאוד בני הג”ר צבי הירש וואלק בעל ‘כתר כהונה’, אשר מילא את מקום הגרא”מ ז”ל משנת תרנ”ה ברבנות פינסק, בהקדמתם לספר ‘כתר כהונה’ על הספרי, וסיימו ש’חבל על דאבדין’[3].

עד מהרה נודע טבען של הגהותיו-חידושיו אלו בעולם, וכל צורב נתוודע לאלתר להערותיו העמוקות והחריפות. בכל קושיא או תירוץ ואף בהערה קצרה של הגרא”מ עומד הוא על כובד מרכז הסוגיא, ובגאונותו דומה עלינו סיגנונו כדוגמת קושיות הגאון רבי עקיבא איגר’[4]. הלומדים בש”ס ידעו להעריך נכונה ‘הגהות תמימות’ אלו, והם תפסו מקום של חשיבות מיוחדת בשורה הראשונה של המפרשים השונים שבסוף הש”ס. כדרך גאוני ליטא הוא אף מחדש פירושים מחודשים המנוגדים לרבותינו הראשונים ז”ל (הפותחים בלשון “ולולי דבריהם”), או מביע הכרעתו בראיות מן התלמוד במקום שנחלקו הראשונים[5].

המשך לקרוא…

מתוך קובץ המעיין, כאן.

עדות על דעת הרה”ק המהר”י מבעלזא זי”ע שהגאולה תבא בדרך הטבע

ציטוט מדברי האדמו”ר מבעלז שליט”א:

במהלך דברות הקודש במעמד ה’לחיים’, שנערך במעונו בקריית יערים – טלז סטון, האדמו”ר סיפר גם ביקור אצל דודו הרה”ק המהר”א מבעלזא זי”ע: “לאחר הקמת המדינה בשנת תש”ח, הקונסול הפולני אמר לדודי ז”ל שיש מנהיגים חרדים שמתנגדים לעניין של מדינה יהודית, ואומרים שזה נגד דעת תורה ושמשיח יבוא קודם, ורק לאחר מכן הארץ תהיה ליהודים. הוא שאל את דודי ז”ל מה הוא אומר על כך. דודי ז”ל ענה כי ‘זה לא כך. בעל האור החיים הקדוש אומר שארץ ישראל תיבנה לפני ביאת המשיח, ולאחר מכן משיח יבוא. הוא הבטיח שנזכה שנהיה על פי תורה'”.

הרבי ציטט גם דברים שאמר הסבא רבא הרה”ק המהר”י מבעלזא זי”ע: ” בתקופת ה’עלטער זיידע ז”ל’ ייסדו קו רכבת חדש, מווינה עד וורשה. הוא אמר: ‘נעבעך, נעבעך, מתברר כנראה שמשיח יגיע בדרך הטבע. שצריך רכבת לקיבוץ נדחי ישראל”.

לקריאה והאזנה (אידיש) כאן…

The Case For Marrying Young, Just Like Chazal Said

OPEN LETTER: The Case For Allowing Our Boys To Marry At A Younger Age

NEW YORK (VINnews/Akiva Lehman) — Dear Reader, 

When speaking out to those close to me, I just get ridiculed. I am seen as an immature little boy who thinks that having a girlfriend would make everything better. Life would be rosy from then on. They assume I don’t understand the seriousness of marriage and the responsibilities it comes with.

But this is untrue.

My parents think that it is only I, that can’t keep from thinking about things that shouldn’t be on a bachur’s mind. All other boys are fine with waiting, seemingly with no issues. All other boys realize the value of growing up before marriage besides for me – a fool.

Untrue.

My parents don’t feel comfortable with me entering shidduchim at this age, but this seems wrong to me. I don’t see the advantage of losing productive years in which I can be bringing up a family. I don’t see the light in delaying the maturity that comes along with marriage. The love, happiness, and fulfilment of marriage is something I want, as well my friends do.

As I grow older, I just feel my inner flame die down. The youthfulness that pushes me to be the best I could, is losing its vigor. May I say that for these energies to continue I need to give my body its physical as well as its emotional nutrients? Is this taboo?

So why does marriage mean so much to me?

A few reasons.

Love.

I shouldn’t need to explain this, but it seems that some need it. There are many forms of love that are dissimilar from one another. For example the love of a brother and sister is different from the love of a parent to child.

At a certain age, when a boy stops being dependent on his parents and wants to build his own life, he needs a partner. This love is a form of union that cannot be replaced with parents’ love or friendships.

This union is meant to help a person grow into what he wants to be. It is NOT meant for fully grown and perfected people. The perfect man, were it to exist, would not need a wife. (I believe I heard that from R’ Miller.)

The young adult years of a man’s life set the path for the rest of his life. There may be people that believe for this reason, that it is better to hold bachurim hostage. Not allowing them to veer off the beaten path, holding them until they are firmly settled. Not so is the view of the Almighty. For success in His world we need to follow His instructions.

טובים השנים מן האחד אשר יש להם שכר טוב בעמלם (קהלת ד,ט)

רש”י: “טובים השנים” – לכל דבר מן האחד לפיכך יקנה לו אדם חבר וישא אשה אשר יש להם יותר ריוח בעמלם. הרבה מלאכה נעשית בשנים שאין היחיד מתחיל בה לבדו.

Notice how Rashi doesn’t say that what a single person starts won’t be successful. Rather he says the single won’t start. He lacks the courage to start and potentially fail. He lacks the motivation needed for success. This refers to all types of success in this world, whether in Torah or in any other area.

This is one of first lessons taught in the Torah; לא טוב האדם להיות לבדו. (Although Rashi says a different pshat, the אבן עזרא refers you to the pasuk quoted above.)

Responsibilities.

טוב לגבר כי־ישא עול בנעוריו.

ילקוט שמעוני: עול תורה ואשה.

The simple reading of this Medrash is that it is good to marry young. But it is deeper than that. It is important for a man to take on responsibilities when he is young. Even if the primary responsibility of a man is the yoke of Torah, he must take on other responsibilities to become responsible. (All the mafarshim on this pasuk explain that it is referring to the yoke of Torah.)

These days a bachur has no responsibilities whatsoever. He can live like a pig if he so wishes, and someone else will clean up his messes. He doesn’t earn his own living; his parents/yeshiva take care of his every need. His only responsibility is to himself; to make something of himself.

The problem here is, as we just pointed out from the Medrash. A person needs other responsibilities to make him responsible. Although a person can technically gain perfection by thought alone, it is nearly impossible. He needs to be put in a situation where he will naturally be inclined to better himself. He will still need to choose, but that situation is much more conducive for the right choice.

An easy example would be a businessman. Although his motives are for money alone, the journey naturally changes him in many positive ways. (Maybe negative ways as well, but that’s not the point here.) This is a classic application of what the Mesilas Yesharim says, החיצוניות מעוררת את הפנימיות. When a person acts responsibly, he becomes a responsible person.

So waiting for a boy to become responsible, in a time and place where it is totally unnecessary, is absurd. It simply will not happen. He needs to take on responsibilities and will grow responsible as a result. The current environment is far more conducive for the opposite. It offers the opportunity to become more entrenched in entitlement mentality, a close relative of laziness.

Only once a person is responsible because of his situation, and the choices made in those situations, would he have the tools to take upon himself other responsibilities like the big responsibility of becoming something. I want responsibilities, as I want to become something. Getting married at this young age is a large step in the right direction. 

Kedusha.

Many of the women readers may know little of the reality on the ground regarding this topic. It is pleasant to think that all our boys are pure as snow, and I wish it were so. However, for the sake of this discussion, I’m afraid that fantasy needs to be shattered. (I am not saying they are terrible, I am just saying we are human.)

I personally know countless bachurim that had big issues with this. Among them are boys that learned in Beis Medrash day and night, and didn’t have smartphones. (Shocker: the יצר הרע was born before 2010!)

On a lesser level, this issue affects almost all bachurim, especially in our generation. This problem is a lot more real than many wish to admit. In chassidish circles there is more of an emphasis on this issue, but in the circles where I grew up it is never mentioned.

The Talmud says that when the great Rav Huna was niftar, they were deciding where he should be buried. They concluded that he should be buried in the same cave as Rav Chiya because they both had thousands of students. Of all the talmidim gathered, no one was willing to enter the cave besides for one by the name of Rav Chaga. His reasoning was as follows:

“I will enter and not be harmed because I came to learn by Rav Huna at the age of 18, delayed married (past 18), and never saw קרי all those years. Plus I know everything he taught…”

Of all those present, he was the only one that could vouch for himself that he didn’t have illicit thoughts that cause קרי. He also emphasized how unique this was because of his older age – 18! We see here clearly, as well in many other places throughout the Talmud, that this is far from a new problem.

So how bad are bad thoughts and the actions that follow? Is it worth getting married to avoid years of potential sin? Let me quote for you a few lessons that the Talmud teaches and you can decide for yourself.

R’ Yochanan said that one who is מוציא זרע לבטלה is liable for death… Rav Yitzchak said he is likened to a murderer…. Rav Asi said he is likened to an Idolator… One who leads himself in this direction should be put in niduy…. He is not allowed in the Mechitza of Hashem… His hand should be cut off. (Niddah 13 a-b)

The Talmud debates if this last one is meant literally. Is it that we should chop his hand off or is it merely a curse? Although the Talmud conclude that it is just a curse, we can see the severity of this issue in the eyes of our sages.

In the words of the Shulchan Aruch (E”H 23:1) “this single sin is worse than any other.”

The Gemara in Kiddushin relates how Rav Chisda spoke very highly of Rav Hamnuna to Rav Huna. When Rav Huna finally met with Rav Hamnuna, he realized that he was more than 20 years old and single; he immediately turned his face away, and scolded him. Rav Huna didn’t want to see his face until he got married.

The Maharsha explains the reason for this harsh reaction is because it is forbidden to look at the face of a rasha. Rav Huna assumed that anyone who is over 20 and single, is doing things that would give him the status of a rasha.

It is worth noting here that a woman, even a married one, cannot possibly understand the yetzer hora of a bachur. It is far deeper than tznius matters, and affects many facets of life. You must also realize that the yetzer hora doesn’t come from seeing bad things. It is built in naturally, (for good reason) it cannot be avoided, and only gets worse from seeing improper things. Blaming the issue on technology is ignoring the obvious. Obviously the best way to deal with a problem is to fix it. In this case, to give the boy the physical and emotional needs that come with his age.

Halacha.

Any practicing Jew needs to follow the laws set forth in the Torah. Even if many people don’t follow a specific halacha, it does not let us off the hook. In fact, following earlier generations in something that they did wrong only makes us get punished for their sins on top of our own. As the pasuk says פֹּקֵד עֲוֺן אָבוֹת עַל-בָּנִים וְעַל-בְּנֵי בָנִים, עַל-שִׁלֵּשִׁים וְעַל-רִבֵּעִים. Hashem punishes one generation for the sins of the past one, if they too continue doing those same sins/mistakes.

So what is the halacha?

The Talmud (kiddushin 29b) says: Rav Huna said that anyone that doesn’t marry before twenty will remain with thoughts of sin his entire life. (That is even after he gets married.) A Breisa taught: Until one reaches the age of twenty years הקב”ה sits and waits for a man, saying: “When will he marry a woman?” Once he reaches the age of twenty and has not married, He says: תיפח עצמותיו””, Let his bones swell, i.e., he is cursed and God is no longer concerned about him.

Based on this the Rambam (Ishus 15:2) rules that one who waits until he is twenty years old has forfeited the Mitzva of Pru Urvu.

Shulchan Aruch: Every man is obligated to marry a woman in order to be fruitful, and to multiply. Anyone who doesn’t engage in פרו ורבו is as if he spills blood, and lessens the appearance (not sure what this means), and causes the divine presence to depart from Israel. Rem”a: He who does not marry is living without blessing without Torah etc. and he is not called a man, conversely, when a man does marry, his sins are cast, as it is said: “One who has found a wife has found goodness and obtains favor in the eyes of God.”

Shulchan Aruch: It is incumbent on every man that they should marry a woman at the age of 18 and the diligent get married at 13 and this mitzvah is for those who choose it …. If 20 years go by and he has not taken a wife and he who lets 20 years pass, the courts can force him to marry in order to fulfill the mitzvah. Rem”a: In this time, the custom is that Beis Din does not force in regards to this. (The reason we don’t force is not because it’s okay, but rather because we don’t have/use the powers of Beis Din completely.)

There is not a single posek that I am aware of that disagrees with any of the above.

There is a well-known heter from the Talmud, which is if someone is engaged in Torah learning he may delay marriage. This heter is also quoted in Shulchan Aruch. However, there are two conditions that need to be met for this: 1. He would not be able to learn after his wedding because he will need to work all day to support his family. 2. He does not have any illicit thoughts.

Both of these conditions are clear in the Gemara. The first condition is not met for the average yeshiva bachur that plans on learning in Kollel, and that his wife will work to support them. (See Gr”a s”k 8 quote from Ran.) The second condition is almost never met, as explained earlier.

When these conditions are not met, one is prohibited to postpone marriage, even if they wish to learn Torah. This would be equal to someone that would turn on a light on Shabbos to be able to learn. (Note: There are other poskim that hold that this heter doesn’t apply for other reasons these days. See Teshuvas Maharam Mintz quoted by R’ Akiva Eiger ibid.)

I will quote some more recent poskim to bring out that anyone you ever trust in regards to halacha agrees to the above.

-וכיון שרוב האנשים יכולים ללמוד כראוי בזמן הלימוד, והטרדה בפרנסה לא מפריע להם בזמן הלימוד וכן הרבה אנשים מוציאים נשים שמתפרנסות ממעשה ידיהם לכן אסור להם לאחר את הנישואין. (דברות משה קידושין סי’ מג)

-חייב אדם לישא עד גיל עשרים ואז לא צריך לבקש זכויות כדי להינצל מהעונש המובא בגמרא [תיפח וחיוב מיתה בידי שמים המובא במדרש קהלת] והוא דבר ברור לדינא (אג”מ אבן העזר ב סי’ א)

-כשמאחר אחר שהגיע לשנת עשרים הקב”ה כועס עליו מאד…. וכל יום ויום שמאחר שלא מחמת אונס עובר בעשה מן התורה…. וגם פעמים רבות בא ע”י עיכוב הנישואין למחלות גדולות …. ולפעמים גורם עון זה למיתת בנים קטנים שיולדו לו אח”כ כמו שכתוב בספרים. (חפץ חיים, בספר נדכי ישראל פרק כה)

Others that hold strongly this way include, the Aruch Hashulchan, Chazon Ish, Stiepler, R’ Chaim Kanievsky (I myself sent him a letter. In the letter I wrote that I had older brothers still single, and my Rosh Yeshiva didn’t allow dating. He still told me that I must get married as stated in halacha.), R’ A.L Shtienman, R’ S.Z. Aurbach, and just about any rabbi you have ever heard of.

Lest someone tell you of a respected posek which argues (not that I know of any), his words should be weighed against all the poskim mentioned above plus many more.

What is the parents’ role in this?

As a son, it is hardly my place to tell parents, let alone my parents what to do. However I will write what the Talmud teaches for the earnest, to heed its timeless words.

The Talmud says that a father is obligated to marry off his son. This obligation is one of the only five things a father actually owes to a child. The list includes ברית מילה, פדיון הבן, ללמדו תורה, ללמדו אומנות, ולהשיאו אשה. The first are easily understood, as the child is not old enough to take care of these things.

The other three are explained simply. If a child doesn’t have these things, he is bound for failure. If he doesn’t know basic chumash (which is the extent of this obligation), he will not know how to learn to lead a kosher Jewish life. If he doesn’t know a craft, he will in all likelihood steal from others for his daily needs. And if he doesn’t have a wife in time, he will always have illicit thoughts for the rest of his life. This, in the eyes of the Torah is a failure of life.

The importance of these 3 things is so, that the Torah considers it wrong of a father to bear children if these needs will be (willfully) neglected. If the child will be reared in a way that his life is headed for failure, everyone could understand that it is incorrect to bring him to this world in the first place. Everything else beyond these basic Jewish needs, the child is expected to attain on his own. This includes Chinuch in mitzvos, which is definitely important, but is only a rabbinic decree. Compared to these three which some opine are biblical.   

Although a mother is exempt from these obligations, I would assume it to be her duty to help her husband in his G-dly work. More importantly, a mother should wish to help her son be the best he could. Obligated or not, this should definitely be high on her list of priorities.

Then there is another angle. This is for parents that not only don’t encourage their children to follow in the way Hashem commanded, but don’t let their children go into shidduchim younger. This in my view is חוטא ומחטיא את הרבים. I believe this would apply to anyone in a position of power and/or influence. Even with correct intentions, persuading another not to do a mitzvah, is a terrible thing. (Obviously this doesn’t apply where the Halacha dictates otherwise.)

I wouldn’t say I don’t understand the parents at all. We usually assume that what most people are doing is the right thing. They may even assume that to let their foolish teen get married at this young age is irresponsible. They think that G-d forbid in case of a divorce it would be them who gets the blame. In the court of public opinion this is likely 100% correct. The heavenly court however, doesn’t rule this way.

Continue reading…

From VIN News, here.

Is Hitler the Chief Warmonger of WWII?

Rothbard (find via this article) said No (relying on A. J. P. Taylor), and modern scholarship doesn’t appear to uproot this view. (Not to mention subtler theories.)

Pat Buchanan’s classic article also has some great questions on the conventional view.

On the other hand, one could argue Divine Providence was so pronounced and clearly orchestrated, both in the rise of Germany and in its fall, that the question of military High Command “intentionality” is silly.

Let’s not pretend Hitler was acting rationally in fighting Russian “General Winter” or the shirk of Dunkirk or giving a perfect political excuse for Roosevelt to attack more than just Japan by… declaring war on America. (That last one always amazes me!)

With such a psychopath, reading his own words on the question helps nothing, but here is Hitler himself, anyway.

(Of course, I am not a historian, etc., etc.)


How is all this related to our focus at Hyehudi.org?

I’m not telling.