Welcoming Event for New American Chareidi Kehillah of Olim: Kehillas Chazon Elimelech of Afula

Come meet with them here in Yerushalayim, welcome them to Eretz Yisroel, and be mechazek them for hatzlacha in their endeavor.
Rabbonim will speak, and refreshments served.
Ezras Nashim open.
Monday evening, Motza’ei Zos Chanukah (Dec. 26), at the Yeshivas Chofetz Chaim hall, Sanhedria Murchevet 6:00 p.m. – 8:45 p.m.
For more info: Yoel Berman 053-319-1618 / yberman613@gmail.com


Yoel Berman 053-3191618 יואל ברמן
***
אגודת קדושת ציון – דרישת ציון על טהרת הקודש
מתחברים למשמעות התורנית המעשית של ארץ ישראל בימינו

מנא להו? – מהו מקור חכמתם של האומות ועיון בדעה שמייחסת את מקור חכמתם לעמנו

Mada.Hazal@Gmail.com

אמיתי אביגדור ©

לקרוא \ להוריד את הספר כאן…

עוד לא עיינתי כ”כ (אין כוחי \ לבי במדעים), אבל המודעות הממוסגרות לקורא מסקרנות מאד.

הודעה ראשונה:

מאמר זה לא נועד לכל אדם. מי שחונך והורגל כל ימיו באמונה תמימה, ומסקנות השונות מהשקפתו יעוררו בו קשיים באמונה – עליו להימנע מלימוד מאמר זה, שכן עדיפה אמונה שאינה מושלמת, מאשר קשיים מושלמים.

עם זאת, דבר פשוט וברור הוא, שגם על אדם כזה חובה לדעת שהבנתו אינה מושלמת בנושא, וקל וחומר שהיא אינה הדעה היחידה, ולא שייך שדווקא הוא יזלזל באלו שמעמיקים לבירור האמת.

הודעה שניה:

דבר ברור הוא שלימוד נושא שכזה מצריך זהירות גדולה, להבדיל בין הקודש ובין החול, ואפילו כמלא שערה. וככל שהאדם מעמיק יותר, עליו להיזהר יותר, שיוסיף דעת יוסיף מכאוב.

עם זאת, מי שראוי לכך, בוודאי עליו לברר את האמת, ודווקא בירור האמת הוא שמביא לאמונה אמיתית, וכדברי הזוהר “לית אמונה בלא אמת” (ח”ג דף קצח:).

ועל כולן אמר רבן יוחנן בן זכאי: אוי לי אם אומר, אוי לי אם לא אומר. אם אומר – שמא ילמדו וכו’, ואם לא אומר – שמא יאמרו וכו’ אין תלמידי חכמים בקיאין וכו’ (בבא בתרא פט: לעניין מיני עוולות במקח וממכר).

לקרוא \ להוריד את הספר מפורטל הדף היומי כאן…

End Road Socialism Now and Save Tens of Thousands of Lives!

40,000 Traffic Fatalities a Year Is Not Acceptable. So Why Do We Accept It Year After Year?

US highway authorities are bemoaning the recent increase in highway fatalities. And, well, they should. With an annual death rate of 40,000 per year on our nations’ roads and streets, the situation is—to say the least—highly regrettable.

Like good bureaucrats, these folks do not intend to stand idly by and do nothing about this scourge. Instead, they intend to implement a myriad of policies tried in the past—which have failed.

For example, the US Department of Transportation shall be addressing “issues ranging from speed limits to emergency medical care.” But this is merely the tip of the iceberg. They shall also be improving “street lighting” and “reducing alcohol-impaired driving.”

Nor does this complete their to-do list. There is also “stricter enforcement of speed limits, seatbelt mandates and drunken-driving laws; better designed roads, especially in poorer neighborhoods; more public transit; and further spread of safety features like automated braking.”

Never fear, Pete Buttigieg, the transportation secretary, is on the job.

“We’ve got to look at what’s working and lift up those communities and those jurisdictions that are doing the best job, in addition to finding measures and performance expectations that will hold those accountable who haven’t been keeping up,” says Buttigieg.

Hey, don’t knock this. None of these nostrums have ever been tried before. Surely, this time, they will work!

Let us sit back and take a deep breath on this matter.

Suppose there was a meeting of the USSR central planning bureau, agricultural division. They were bewailing the poor quantity and quality of produce on the nation’s farms. They resolved to use better crop rotation, more fertilizer, leaving lands idle once every seven years in order to improve fertility, the importation of new varieties of products, better extermination of pests, more and improved tractors, education for the farm workers, and such.

Now suppose someone burst into these deliberations and said the following: “But we’ve already tried all these things. Every last one of them. We’re still in the same pickle. Have we not learned anything from the fact that our collectivized farms comprise 97% of the acreage of country, and grow 75% of the crops, while from the farm workers’ private gardens emanate 25% of the crops, on land amounting to 3% of the total? Let us privatize all Russian farms!”

Undoubtedly, in the USSR such an interloper would have been summarily shot.

I hope and trust this fate will not befall me since I advocate that very same solution for our nation’s highways. Privatize ‘em all.

Although I will not of course be shot for saying this, the same level of incredulity is likely to greet my suggestion, as would have been the reaction to this hypothetical free-enterprise Soviet economist.

People will say, well, you can indeed privatize agricultural land, but highways and streets are another kettle of fish. It simply cannot be done! They are a natural public good. (This latter bit of invincible ignorance means they were mistaught introductory microeconomics.)

Wrong. The first private roads date back to England, before the 10th century. During revolutionary times in the US many streets were private post roads. They would charge fees based upon the number of horses and axels in those dirt road days. They even based charges on width of wheels; narrow—think ice skates which put ruts in the road—cost more; wide—think steam rollers which flattened it out—less.

Of course we need to reduce drunk driving, driver inattention, speeding, vehicle breakdowns, etc. But we need private managers to do so, in competition with one another. Have we not yet learned the economic aphorism that competition tends to create a better product at a lower cost? Who says that one set of rules for the entire nation, emanating from Washington DC is the best way to approach this or any other problem? Maybe what should be addressed is not only the level of speed, but its variance? Perhaps each lane should have its own speed limit, not a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 70 all throughout. We must think outside the box if we are to make any progress in making driving safer.

How long will we have to wait to even seriously contemplate the privatization of this important aspect of our economy? Do we as a society want to radically reduce these horrendous traffic fatality statistics, or don’t we? If so, it behooves us to think radically, not in the same old tired ruts.

From LRC, here.

Serious Tanach Study Is Almost Entirely Neglected in the Orthodox World Today

What’s Pshat?

This week’s Torah class is a fundamental lesson on “pshat”, which is the subject of much confusion.  The recording is available here.
Serious Tanach study is almost entirely neglected in the Orthodox world today.  Most people still understand Tanach on the level of a 10-year old, which is approximately when the cookie-cutter yeshiva they attended transferred them to the Gemara assembly line.
Why is it this way? Because it’s good PR for the yeshivas, and more impressive for a Bar Mitzvah boy, a little pisher, to read a complex pilpul that someone else wrote for him than something more suitable for his age and level.  And, of course, long term it’s better for shidduchim.  No one’s impressed by someone studying Chumash and Rashi (even though that’s exactly what the Chafetz Chaim was “caught” doing) and, at the end of the day, it’s all about impressing people.
That’s not the official reason it’s done this way, but it’s the truth.
And it’s a disaster.
Maybe a long time ago it was an eis la’asos and Tanach study needed to be put a little bit on the back burner.  But it’s a disaster today, on many levels.  It was never intended for Jews to be functionally illiterate when it comes to Tanach, or to permanently relate to it on a child’s level.
I have a lot to say about this.  My first year learning in Israel I was in the highest Gemara shiur and I hated it.  I confided in my night seder Rebbe, who I was close with, that we were sitting and learning Gemara all day, but I didn’t even know Chumash and Rashi.
We started a seder together in Chumash and Rashi, and I continued learning all of Tanach on my own.  It bothered me that I didn’t know Tanach.  It didn’t bother anyone else in the yeshiva, and presumably they still never bothered to open the books written by our greatest prophets.
The yeshiva was not happy with me.  I dropped out of the shiur, didn’t join another one, did my own thing, and almost got thrown out because of it.  I got into more trouble for carving out my own learning program (which included Gemara) than people who got drunk every night and fooled around, because what I was doing was dangerous to them.  I was succeeding, and I wasn’t doing it their way.  That’s an existential threat.
The same story repeated itself my second year in Israel in a different yeshiva, and in Yeshiva University.  I was told by two prominent rabbis, one in Israel and one in YU, that studying Tanach was bittul Torah.  Yes, they uttered those words.
Someone in my family, a young woman in her twenties, recently spoke proudly about how she is learning Gemara.  She later asked me in all seriousness what the big deal is about Rashi’s commentary on Chumash.  After all, she said, all he does is quote Midrashim.  She wasn’t being disrespectful, she geuninely didn’t know.
This is progress?  This is education?
For the last two years Erev Rav have been able to get away with telling people that we have to do whatever doctors say, because a pasuk says that doctors can and should heal.  They take a simple pasuk, twist it in ways that would make even a Karaite blush, and yeshiva-educated Jews have no idea how badly they are being played.
Then yeshiva-educated people, people with semicha themselves who give Torah classes, tell me in all seriousness that we have to do whatever “the rabbis” say, because of a pasuk that says we cannot veer to the right or left of what the judge tells us.  No context, no boundaries, no explanation.
Of course, this is a complete distortion (I wrote about it here and spoke about it here), but these people understand Tanach about as much as a Christian with his King James Bible.  So the pasuk says, that’s the pshat, end of story.  Go take the shot and jump off the cliff if they say so.
So yes, it matters if people are ignorant of Tanach, even if they can dazzle you with a brilliant dissection of a line of Gemara twelve different ways, which will make no practical difference in anyone’s life, except when it comes to fundraising for the yeshiva and getting the “best” shidduchim.
So Tanach has been left for children, pseudo-intellectuals who have no respect for Chazal, Bible critics, and missionaries. Shlomo HaMelech, the wisest of all men, apparently wrote three books that have nothing important to teach us.  The Rishonim wasted their time writing commentaries when they could have been learning even more Gemara.  And we should just keep the assembly line moving as it is, because maybe we will churn out a few more Talmudic scholars, even if everyone else gets turned off to Judaism, even if many of those who stick around are cold and hollow inside and just go through the motions of “being frum” in observable ways.  A little Tanach learned properly wouldn’t solve all their problems — our problems run very deep — but it would go a long way.
I have a lot more to say about this, but this is enough for now.  If you can relate to any of this, you will probably enjoy this week’s Torah class.  And if you can’t relate to any of this, you need to listen to this week’s Torah class more than you know, even if it infuriates you, because all the gedolim this, and all the gedolim that.  That’s never true anyway, I don’t care if people are infuriated, never did, and I’m not about to start now.  This needs to be said.
Because it’s tragic for Jewish adults who went through the yeshiva world to be ignorant of Tanach, and even more tragic if they think that’s exactly the way it should be.
The class is available here.

__________________________

Hundreds of articles and more: chananyaweissman.com/

Join my Rumble channel: rumble.com/c/c-782463

The Shidduch Chronicles and my documentary, Single Jewish Male, are available here.

Download Tovim Ha-Shenayim as a PDF for free! My books are available on Amazon and in Israel directly from me. Email me to order.

If you received this from someone else and want to receive future articles directly, please send a request to endthemadness@gmail.com.