כל התורה כולה מכחישה את שיטת בריסק

הנה אנשי בריסק עושים כל התורה כחוקים ללא שום טעם דוקא, וכלשונם שכל דבר הוא אך “גזירת הכתוב“. אבל בתורה עצמה למדים לא כן, שמסמיך דינים רבים להיסטוריה הקשורה אליהם. לא רק אכילת מצות ומרור ליציאת מצרים, או גיד הנשה למעשה יעקב עם המלאך, אלא אף טהרת פרה אדומה נסמכה למות מרים וכיו”ב, אף שאינו הוראה ישירה לעוסקים בעצמות מרים, ואפשר שכבר למדו דינים אלו מקודם, שאין מוקדם ומאוחר בתורה. וכ”ז בכונה תחילה כדי לתת טוב טעם ודעת לדברי התורה, שלא יהיו כמשפטי הגויים היבשים.
וזאת מלבד כל המקומות שאומר בפירוש איזה טעם הקרוב ללב כמו אהבת וחמלת ונתינת מתנות לגר “כי גרים הייתם כו'” וכן תלה איסורי כישוף וע”ז וכו’ ביושבי מצרים וכנען, אף שכמובן לא נתגלו כאן טעמי תורה, אפילו לחומרא, ומכ”ש שלא לקולא (אבל יש כמה מקומות שהטעם נ”מ גדולה לחומרא, ואכ”מ).
ואולי זהו מ”ש “הסכת ושמע” דברים כ”ז ט’. “הסכת”, כלומר התבונן בשקט נפשי (פירוש המילה “הסכת”) להרגיש ולהבין בשמיעת הלב את מצוות התורה, ע”ד “לשמוע בקול”, כמ”ש הרש”ר הירש זצ”ל. ולא ציוה רחמנא בשום מקום על “ציות” במובן המודרני, דהיינו קיום עיוור (כגון בהקשר צבאי).
ועיין פירוש רלב”ג דברים י”ד שתורתנו שכלית היא, ועד”ז כתוב גם בספר מורה הנבוכים. שמע מינה שיש לנו ללמוד את התורה בצורה אנושית ואינטואיטיבית. ואם התורה לא משתנה לעד ולע”ע, א”כ גם זה עדיין קיים, למרות “ירידת הדורות”, ורק כך יש ללמוד את התורה.
וגם אני יודע שלא יכנע לבבם הערל בזאת, רק ישיבו שגם לשונות המקרא הנ”ל וסדרי המקראות והטעמים הרבים בו הם אך “גזירת הכתוב” בלבד…

אם תכתוש את האויל במכתש בתוך הריפות בעלי לא תסור מעליו אולתו.

US Welfare State Stats

Teenage pregnancies, venereal diseases, dependency on government and murder rates were all going down during the much-disdained 1950s. All reversed and shot up as the welfare state, and the social vision behind the welfare state took over in the 1960s.

That vision featured non-judgmental rewards and non-judgmental leniency toward counterproductive behavior, whether crime or irresponsible sex and its consequences. But relieving people from the responsibilities and challenges of life is doing them no favor. Nor is it a favor to society at large.

ועל מי יש לנו להשען? על אבינו שבשמים – שולי רנד

שולי רנד – בך בטחו אבותינו // מתוך פרויקט צמאה 3

Published on Sep 25, 2016

בך בטחו אבותינו – מתוך האלבום צמאה 3

מילים (תהלים כב, ה-ו): בְּךָ בָּטְחוּ אֲבֹתֵינוּ, בָּטְחוּ וַתְּפַלְּטֵמוֹ: אֵלֶיךָ זָעֲקוּ וְנִמְלָטוּ, בְּךָ בָטְחוּ וְלֹא בוֹשׁוּ.

התרגשות גדולה לקראת צאתו של האלבום השלישי בסדרת ‘צמאה’, חבלי הלידה לקראת הדיסק היו לא קלים.
את הסינגל שבחרנו לשחרר מבצע היוצר המופלא שולי רנד. את הניגון בחר שולי בעצמו מתוך חיבור אישי אליו, הוא הרגיש שהמילים ממש נוגעות בו.

המשך לקרוא…

מאתר יוטיוב, כאן.

Marry Young!

You’re Ready!

By: Rabbi Shalom Arush

Translated by Rabbi Lazer Brody

Dear Rabbi Arush,

I’m a 21-year old student in a yeshiva for English-speaking Baalei Teshuva. I gave up a scholarship to university to learn Torah fulltime, and I have been learning for a little more than two years now. Recently, someone suggested a shidduch that seems to be very appropriate. I asked my rabbi here at the yeshiva, and he said I’m not ready and I should be learning for at least another year or two before I even listen to prospective marital proposals. I don’t want to dispute with my rabbi, Heaven forbid, but my heart tells me that he’s not right on this matter. I know that you are extremely busy, but I’m writing for your guidance and opinion. What’s more, I’m sure that there are many other people in my situation who could benefit from your answer. With utmost respect and appreciation, Joshua from NJ

Dear Joshua,

Your letter is of utmost importance and I’m glad you wrote.

Don’t be angry at your rabbi. He cannot teach you what his rabbis did not teach him. Many rabbis and teachers within the Yeshiva world never learned the profound importance of learning in holiness or the priceless value of every day of holiness.

Many think that marrying young is a Chassidish practice and that Torah scholars should emulate Ben Azai and delay marriage. The Torah giants of Judaism don’t agree. The Steipler Rav, of blessed and saintly memory, moaned the phenomena of the many older and unmarried Yeshiva students, and encouraged people to get married while they’re young. Why? Marriage teaches us character development, compromise, understanding, consideration and self-improvement. You don’t develop good character by staying single. If one learns Torah with uncorrected character traits and arrogance – both of which must be corrected to be happily married – his Torah learning will go to fueling his ego even further. Rebbe Shimon bar Yochai warns against this in the Zohar.

I appreciate the fact that your rabbi thinks that you should have more Gemara, Halacha and Torah-learning skills under your belt before you get married. Yet, the value of one day’s learning in holiness will override a month of learning as a bachelor. Marrying young and personal holiness are so vital that I wrote about it in three of my books – The Garden of Wisdom, The Garden of Peace and the Garden of Purity. Also, many of my inspirational pamphlets and CDs speak about this. I urge you – and your rabbi – to read them. In the meanwhile though, I’ll summarize eight important reasons why you should not delay finding a soul-mate as soon as possible and getting married:

1. Our sages teach us not to delay doing a mitzvah once we have the opportunity to perform the mitzvah. The Torah’s first command to mankind is, “Be fruitful and multiply.” As with every other mitzvah, we should strive to fulfill the commandment of marriage and starting a family as soon as possible.

2. Our sages teach that a person must marry before the age of twenty to maintain a pure mind. Why? A man who marries young is far more capable of maintaining personal holiness, or tikkun habrit, which is conducive to every blessing in life – good income, success, peace of mind and especially Torah learning. Even though you’ve already passed the age of 20, it’s not too late to benefit from the blessings of getting married early – you’re certainly ready.

3. An unmarried person is not a whole person, for he or she lacks a soul mate from whom he or she can derive tremendous strength and gratification. Therefore, a person should marry as soon as he or she is mature enough. The claims that one should first complete higher education, learn more Torah or save the needed funds are erroneous. Indeed, a married person is much more settled and serious as far as Torah and professional learning go. Not only in Yeshiva, but even in university or professional school, married men can concentrate on their studies rather than on other things that occupy – even monopolize – a single young person’s thoughts.

4. The greats of Israel almost all married at a young age. Not only did marriage not hinder their personal and spiritual growth, but it helped them become great. Rebbe Nachman himself married at the age of 13, and so did Rebbe Natan. True, that was a different generation, but you get the point – every day of holiness is priceless.

5. A couple living in holiness is the ideal vessel for abundance, whereas single people are not.

6. Since a married person must provide for a wife and children, he gives Hashem the reasons to give him the blessings of an income and livelihood, as well as good character.

7. Marriage gives a person stability and motivation. A married person has a reason to apply himself. He’s much more serious and mature and less confused and swayed.

8. The younger a person is, the more adaptable he or she is to a spouse. Younger parents often have a closer rapport with their children.

Consider the above and I’m sure you’ll make the right decision. You have my blessing for finding a wonderful soul-mate and building a beautiful home of emuna, Torah, love and loving-kindness.

With blessings always, Shalom Arush

From Breslev.co.il, here.

Ron Paul: US Is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

Is North Korea Really a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’?

President Trump announced last week that he was returning North Korea to the US list of “state sponsors of terrorism” after having been off the list for the past nine years. Americans may wonder what dramatic event led the US president to re-designate North Korea as a terrorism-sponsoring nation. Has Pyongyang been found guilty of some spectacular terrorist attack overseas or perhaps of plotting to overthrow another country by force? No, that is not the case. North Korea is back on the US list of state sponsors of terrorism because President Trump thinks the move will convince the government to give up its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile program. He believes that continuing down the path toward confrontation with North Korea will lead the country to capitulate to Washington’s demands. That will not happen.

President Trump and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson argued that North Korea deserved to be back on the list because the North Korean government is reported to have assassinated a North Korean citizen – Kim Jong-Un’s own half-brother — in February at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport. But what does that say about Washington’s own program to assassinate US citizens like Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son under Obama, and later Awlaki’s six-year-old daughter under Trump? Like Kim’s half-brother, Awlaki and his two children were never tried or convicted of a crime before being killed by their own government.

The neocons, who are pushing for a war with North Korea, are extremely pleased with Trump’s move. John Bolton called it “exactly the right thing to do.”

Designating North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism will allow President Trump to impose the “highest level of sanctions” on North Korea. Does anyone believe more sanctions – which hurt the suffering citizens of North Korea the most – will actually lead North Korea’s leadership to surrender to Washington’s demands? Sanctions never work. They hurt the weakest and most vulnerable members of society the hardest and affect the elites the least.

So North Korea is officially a terrorism-sponsoring nation according to the Trump Administration because Kim Jong-Un killed a family member. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is in the process of killing the entire country of Yemen and no one says a word. In fact, the US government has just announced it will sell Saudi Arabia $7 billion more weapons to help it finish the job.

Also, is it not “state-sponsorship” of terrorism to back al-Qaeda and ISIS, as Saudi Arabia has done in Syria?

The truth is a “state sponsor of terrorism” designation has little to do with actual support for global terrorism. As bad as the North Korean government is, it is does not go abroad looking for countries to invade. The designation is a political one, allowing Washington to ramp up more aggression against North Korea.

Next month the US and South Korean militaries will conduct a massive military exercise practicing an attack on North Korea. American and South Korean air force fighters and bombers will practice “enemy infiltration” and “precision strike drills.” Are these not also to be seen as threatening?

What is terrorism? Maybe we should ask a Yemeni child constantly wondering when the next Saudi bomb overhead might kill his family. Or perhaps we might even ask a Pakistani, Somali, Iraqi, Syrian, or other child who is terrified that the next US bomb will do the same to his family. Perhaps we need to look at whether US foreign policy actually reflects the American values we claim to be exporting before we point out the flaws in others.

From Lewrockwell.com, here.